期刊文献+

无创血流动力学监测在妇科阴式手术中的应用 被引量:6

The accuracy and thresholds of continuous noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring in vaginal surgery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨通过无创血流动力学监测的方法预测液体反应能力的准确性及阈值。方法选择妇科择期行阴式手术全麻患者20例。使用LiDCOrapid(CNAP)监测仪,分别于麻醉诱导前(T1)、插管后(T2)、容量试验(T3)记录HR、SBP、DBP、MAP、PPV、SVV、CO、SV、SVI等血流动力学指标。以输液后△SVI≥10%为阳性组,△SVI<10%为阴性组,绘制相关参数的受试者工作特征(receiver operation characteristic,ROC)曲线,计算曲线下面积(the area under the curves,AUC),评价SVV和PPV预测液体反应的能力。结果容量反应实验,SVV的ROC曲线下面积为0.76,诊断阈值为11%(灵敏度为85.7%,特异度为76.9%);PPV的ROC曲线面积为0.79,阈值为12%(灵敏度为85.7%,特异度为53.8%)。结论妇科阴式手术应用Li DCOrapid(CNAP)监测仪,所测的PPV和SVV有较好的预测液体反应能力。 Objective To validate the accuracy and thresholds of continuous noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring in predicting fluid responsiveness. Methods Twenty female patients undergoing selective vaginal surgery were en- rolled. Before the induction anesthesia, HR, SBP, DBP, MAP,PPV, SVV, CO , SV and SVI were recorded by the LiDCO rapid monitor when the circulation state became stable. After the induction anesthesia, HR, SBP, DBP, MAP, PPV, SVV, CO, SV and SVI were recorded again. Then the volume therapy was performed. Fluid positive responsiveness was defined as an increase in SVI≥10%. The ROC was used to assess the ability of each parameter to predict the fluid responsiveness. Results The AUCof SVV was 0.76, the threshold of SVV was ll%(Sensitivity 85.7%, Specificity 76.9%), the AUC of PPV was 0.79, the threshold of PPV was12%(Sensitivity85.7%, Specificity 53.8%). Conclusion SVV and PPV can predict fluid responsiveness accurately during vaginal surgery.
出处 《北京医学》 CAS 2017年第6期566-568,共3页 Beijing Medical Journal
关键词 无创血流动力学监测 预测容量反应 阴式手术 noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring predicting fluid responsiveness vaginal surgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献16

  • 1Auler JJ, Galas F, Hajjar L. Online monitoring of pulse pressure variation to guide fluid therapy after cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg,2008,106:1201-1206.
  • 2Hofer CK, Cannesson M. Monitoring fluid responsiveness. Acta Anaesthesiologiea Taiwanica,2011,49:59-65.
  • 3Derichard A, Robin E, Tavernier B, et al. Automated pulse pres- sure and stroke volume variations from radial artery: evaluation during major abdominal surgery. Br J Anaesth,2009,103:678-684.
  • 4Benes J, Chytra I, Ahmann P, et al. Intraoperative fluid optimiza- tion using stroke volume variationin high risk surgical patients:re- suits of prospective randomized study. Crit Care,2010,14:R118.
  • 5Biais M, Nouette-Gaulain K, Cottenceau V. Cardiac out- put measurement in patients undergoing liver transplantation: pul- monary artery catheter versus uncalibrated arterial pressure wave- form analysis. Anesth Analg,2008,106:1480-1486.
  • 6Hofer CK, Mailer SM, Furrer L, et al. Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass gTafting. Chest,20OS, 128:848-854.
  • 7Akka SG, Becher L, Kozieras J, et al. Effects of changes in blood pressure and airway pfessures on parameters of fluid responsive- ness. Eur J Anaesthesiol,2009,26:322-327.
  • 8Feldheiser A, Pavlova V, Weimann K, et al. Haemodynamic optimi- zation by oesophageal Doppler and pulse power wave analysis in liv- er surgery: A randomised controlled trial[J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10: e0132715.
  • 9Ramsingh DS, Sanghvi C, Gamboa J, et al. Outcome impact of goal directed fluid therapy during high risk abdominal surgery in low to moderate risk patients: a randomized controlled trial[J]. J Clin Monit Comput, 2013, 27:249-257.
  • 10Salzwedel C, Puig J, Carstens A, et al. Perioperative goal-directed hemodynamic therapy based on radial arterial pulsepressure varia- tion and contiuuous cardiac index trending t~duces postoperative- complications after major abdominal surgery:a muhi-center, pro- spective, randomized study[J]. Crit Care, 2013, 17:R 191.

共引文献7

同被引文献42

引证文献6

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部