期刊文献+

开窗术治疗下颌骨成釉细胞瘤术后骨密度分析

Fenestration in the Treatment of Mandibular Ameloblastoma of Bone Mineral Density Changes after Analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨彻底切除术后联合开窗术治疗下颌骨成釉细胞瘤的效果。方法选取2013年6月~2015年1月我院收治的下颌骨成釉细胞瘤患者30例,对肿瘤进行彻底切除后并将内层骨质0.2cm给予磨除,术后给予术区开窗,术后1个月、2个月、3个月、5个月、8个月、1年时定期复查,给予拍摄曲面断层片观察术区恢复情况并观察面部外形恢复情况,测量术区内的相对骨密度,评价其治疗效果。结果术后1个月时术区内相对骨密度较之前平均增加了4.09%,术后2个月时较术前平均增加了7.12%,术后3个月时较术前平均增加了12.25%,5个月时较术前平均增加了22.07%,8个月时较术前平均增加了27.15%,1年时复查较术前平均增加了49.06%.结论彻底切除术联合开窗术治疗下颌骨成釉细胞瘤能有效消除肿瘤,缩小术腔,促进新生骨质形成,避免肿瘤复发,促进面部外形恢复。 Objective To investigate the joint after radical resection of fenestration for the treatment of mandibular ameloblastoma. Methods From June 2013 to January 2015,30 patients with mandibular ameloblastoma in our hospital were selected. After radical resection of the tumor,the internal bone 0. 2cm was performed and postoperative fenestration was performed,after 1 month,2 months,3 months,five months,eight months,1 year,periodic review by shooting the area of surface fault observation recovery and observed facial shape recovery,relative measurement technique in bone mineral density,evaluated its therapeutic effect. Results Postoperative 1 month when the surgery was relatively reduced bone mineral density in the area before the average increased by 4. 09%,after two months grew by an average of 7. 12%compared with preoperative,postoperative 3 months grew by an average of 12. 25%,compared with preoperative 5 months grew by an average of 22. 07%,compared with preoperative at 8 months grew by an average of 27. 15%,compared with preoperative 1 in a review of the preoperative increased 49. 06% on average. Conclusions Radical resection combined fenestration in the treatment of mandibular ameloblastoma can effectively eliminate the tumor,narrow cavity,promote new bone formation,prevent tumor recurrence,promote facial appearance.
出处 《潍坊医学院学报》 2017年第4期276-278,共3页 Acta Academiae Medicinae Weifang
关键词 开窗术 下颌骨成釉细胞瘤 骨密度 Windowing Mandibular ameloblastoma Bone mineral density
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献49

  • 1余东升,赵玮,吴晓林,俞娟.开窗减压术与负压吸引术治疗颌骨大型牙源性囊性病变的对比研究[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2011,5(14):4093-4099. 被引量:19
  • 2陈小晖,祝宇鹏,杨胜宏,程祥荣,程勇,张俊.套筒冠义齿用于牙周病修复治疗后的根周骨质变化[J].口腔医学研究,2004,20(5):532-534. 被引量:11
  • 3黄萍,章锦才,黄海云,庞若愚,戚刚刚,杨霞.202例牙周炎患者患病情况的调查[J].华西口腔医学杂志,2005,23(1):38-40. 被引量:5
  • 4胡永杰,李思毅,张陈平.开窗减压术治疗下颌骨大型囊性病变的临床研究[J].口腔颌面外科杂志,2005,15(4):352-356. 被引量:56
  • 5马绪臣,王松灵,王虎等.口腔颌面医学影像诊断学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2004.151.
  • 6Hildebolt CF, Pilgram TK, Yokoyama-Crothers N, et al. Alveolar bone height and postcranial bone mineral density: Negative effects of cigarette smoking and parity[J]. J Periodontol, 2000, 71 (5) : 683-689.
  • 7Tezal M, Wactawski-Wende J, Grossi SG, et al. The relationship between bone mineral density and periodontitis in postmenopausal women[J]. J Periodontol, 2000, 71(9):1492-1498.
  • 8Inagaki K, Kurosu Y, Kamiya T, et al. Low metacarpal bone density, tooth loss, and periodontal disease in Japanese women [J]. J Dent Res, 2001, 80(9):1818-1822.
  • 9Yasar F, Akgunlu F. The differences in panoramic mandibular indices and fractal dimension between patients with and without spinal osteoporosis[J]. Dentomaxillofae Radiol, 2006, 35(1):1-9.
  • 10Drozdzowska B, Pluskiewicz W, Tarnawska B. Panoramic-based mandibular indices in relation to mandibular bone mineral density and skeletal status assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and quantitative ultrasound[J]. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 2002, 31 (6) : 361-367.

共引文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部