摘要
戏曲创作在中国古代被当做不入流的"小道",不惟著者没有版权意识,录者于各家姓氏名号也只略书大概,因此一部作品被著录在多位作者名下,抑或张冠李戴之现象常有发生。研究者如若不察,难免被其误导。关于明传奇《双烈记》的作者著录,几部较为权威的辞书之间多有相悖之处,本文结合文献资料加以考述,并从戏曲文本着手加以分析比照,力图纠其错谬,还原事实。
The Chinese opera work was known as low-class in ancient China, thus not only the writer didn't have copyright protection awareness, but the recorders just mentioned them roughly. Then one piece of drama work was put down in different writers' names usually, or sometimes a writer was confused with the other. If the researchers weren't careful enough, they would be misguided. As for the writer of Shuanglie Ji, an opera in Ming dynasty, several famous lexicographical books disagree with each other. Based on relevant literature, this essay analyzes and compares the text of this opera,trying to correct the wrong and offer the truth.
出处
《兰台世界》
2017年第9期112-115,共4页
Lantai World
基金
2013年国家社科基金项目"城市人文生态与明代南京剧坛研究"(13CB090)
关键词
双烈记
张四维
作者
南京
Shuanglieji
Zhang Siwei
writer
Nanjing