1Justi R, van Driel JH. The development of science leachers' knowledge on models and modelling: promot- ing, characterizing, and understanding the process [ J ]. hlternational Journal of Science Education, 2005, 27(5) :549 - 573.
2Coil RK, France B, Taylor I. The role of models and analogies in science education : implications from re- search [ J ]. International Journal of Science Education, 2005,27 (2) : 183 - 198.
3Itter C, Harwood WS, Bonner JJ. The influence of core teaching conceptions ova teachers' use of in- quiry teaching practices [ J ]. J Res Sci Teach, 2007,44 (9) : 1318 - 1347.
4Schwarz CV, Reiser BJ, Davis EA, Kenyon L, Acher A, Fortus D, et al. Developing a Learning Progression for Scientific Modeling: Making Scientific Modeling Accessible and Meaningful for Learners [ J 1. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2009,46 (6) : 632 - 654.
5Bell B. Pedagogies developed in the Learning in Science Projects and related theses[J]. International Jour- nal of Science Education, 2005,27 (2) : 159 - 182.
6Sins PHM, Savelsbergh ER, van Joolingen WR. The difficult process of scientific modelling : An analysis of novices' reasoning during computer - based modelling [ J ]. International Journal of Science Education, 2005,27(14) : 1695 - 1721.
7Duncan RG, Hmelo - Silver CE. Learning progressions: Aligning curriculum, instruction, and assessment [ J 1. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2009,46 (6) : 606 - 609.
8Nehm RH, Schonfeld IS. Measuring Knowledge of Natural Selection: A Comparison of the CINS, an Open - Response Instrument, and an Oral Interview [ J ]. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2008,45 (10) : 1131 - 1160.
9Dogan N, Abd - E1 - Khalick F. Turkish Grade 10 Student' and Science Teachers'Conceptions of Nature of Science: A National Study[J~. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,2008,45(10) : 1083 - 1112.
10Krajcik J. The Importance, Cautions and Future of Learning Progression Research [ A ] A, Gotwals A, editors. Learning Progressions in Science[ C ] : SensePublishers, 2012:27 - 36.
