期刊文献+

虚源法相关道集噪声压制技术 被引量:4

Suppress of virtual source method's correlated gather noise
原文传递
导出
摘要 复杂近地表条件通常制约着常规地震勘探的成像精度,而虚源法可以通过逆时重构消除近地表的影响,实现前提为检波器放置于复杂近地表之下,其优点是在处理阶段不需要建立复杂的近地表速度模型.本文首先通过逆时原理和扰动理论对虚源法的理论基础进行了研究,通过对虚源法的实现方法进行对比,得出结论:上下行波分离与加时窗结合的实现方法可以有效压制有限震源孔径造成的成像假象.验证了利用边缘道衰减压制互相关道集边界效应的有效性. Complex near surface conditions usually restricts the imaging accuracy of conventional seismic exploration,the virtual source method uses time-reversal logic to eliminate the effects of complex overburden, which requires place geophone under overburden in the acquisition phase,its advantage is that no knowledge of the overburden velocity model is required. Firstly,we carry on the physical interpretation of the virtual source method based on time-reversal technique and perturbation theory. Then,three different implementation ways of the method are compared,conclusion can be drawn: combination of wavefield separation and gating can effectively eliminate the artifacts caused by the limited source aperture typically used in practice. Edge trace attenuation is verified to suppress the edge effect of cross-correlation gather.
出处 《地球物理学进展》 CSCD 北大核心 2017年第3期1154-1160,共7页 Progress in Geophysics
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(41176077 41230318) 国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划)项目(2013AA092501)联合资助
关键词 虚源 逆时 扰动理论 波场分离 边界效应 virtual source time-reverse perturbation theory wavefield separation edge effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献25

  • 1朱新慧,孙付平.用甚长基线干涉测量数据检测冰期后地壳回弹[J].地球物理学报,2005,48(2):308-313. 被引量:12
  • 2孙建宝,徐锡伟,沈正康,石耀霖,梁芳.基于线弹性位错模型及干涉雷达同震形变场反演1997年玛尼Mw7.5级地震参数-Ⅰ.均匀滑动反演[J].地球物理学报,2007,50(4):1097-1110. 被引量:35
  • 3Claerbout J F. Synthesis of a layered medium from its acoustic transmission response. Geophysics, 1968, 33 (2) : 264-269.
  • 4Katz L J. Inverse vertical seismic profiling while drilling: United States Patent, Patent Number : 5,012,453, 1991.
  • 5Rickett J, Claerbout J. Passive seismic imaging applied to synthetic data. Stanford Exploration Project. 1996. 87-94.
  • 6Schuster G T. Theory of Daylight/Interferometric Imaging: Tutorial. 63ra annual EAGE meeting, Expanded Abstracts. Salt Lake City: University of Utah, 2001, A-32.
  • 7Schuster G T, Yu J, Sbeng J, et al. Interferometric/dayligbt seismic imaging. Geophys. J. Int. , 2004, 1S7(2) : 838- 852.
  • 8Draganov D, Ghose R, Ruigrok E, et al. Seismic interferometry, intrinsic losses and Q-estimation. Geophysical Prospecting, 2010, 58(3): 361-373.
  • 9Bakulin A, Calvert R. Virtual source: New method for imaging and 4D below complex overburden. 74th Annual Meeting, SEG Expanded Abstracts. 2004. 2477-2480.
  • 10Chavarria J A, Goertz A, Karrenbach M, et al. The use ofVSP techniques for fault zone characterization: An example from the San Andreas Fault. The Leading Edge, 2007, 26 (6) : 770-776.

共引文献18

同被引文献24

引证文献4

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部