期刊文献+

术前新辅助放化疗对T3、T4期低位直肠癌患者疗效及复发的影响 被引量:2

Effect of Preoperative Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy on Efficacy of Recurrence of Stage-T3,T4 Low Rectal Cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨术前新辅助放化疗对T3、T4期低位直肠癌患者疗效及复发的影响。方法:将2010年2月至2012年2月梅州市人民医院收治的低位直肠癌患者90例随机分为两组,各45例。两组均采用全直肠系膜切除术(TME)联合新辅助放化疗,其中对照组术后放化疗,而观察组术前放化疗,比较两组手术疗效、术后1年、3年生存率、复发率及并发症发生率。结果:观察组手术总有效率、术后1年、3年生存率均明显高于对照组,复发率与并发症发生率明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:T3、T4期低位直肠癌患者行术前新辅助放化疗,可显著改善手术疗效,预防复发,延长生存期。 Objective To investigate the effect of preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on efficacy of recurrence of stage-T3, T4 low rectal cancer. Methods 90 patients with low rectal cancer in our hospital from February 2010 to February 2012 were randomly divided into two groups, 45 cases in each. Two groups took total mesorectal excision(TME) combined with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, control group took postoperative chemoradiotherapy and observation group took preoperative chemoradiotherapy. The surgical efficacy, survival rate after surgery for 1 year and 3 years, recurrence rate and incidence of complications of two groups were compared. Results The total surgical effective rate, survival rate after surgery for 1 year and 3 years of observation group were significantly higher than those of control group, the recurrence rate and the incidence of complications were significantly lower than control group(P<0.05). Conclusion Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for stage-T3, T4 low rectal cancer can significantly improve surgical efficacy, prevent recurrence and prolong survival period, which is worthy of promotion.
机构地区 梅州市人民医院
出处 《深圳中西医结合杂志》 2017年第7期5-7,共3页 Shenzhen Journal of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine
关键词 新辅助放化疗 低位直肠癌 全直肠系膜切除术 Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy Low rectal cancer Total mesorectal excision
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献91

  • 1直肠癌规范化诊疗指南(试行)[J].中国医学前沿杂志(电子版),2013,5(7):56-61. 被引量:36
  • 2王泽军,张汝一,王文玲,徐才惠,胡银强,王志勇.新辅助同步放化疗联合全直肠系膜切除术治疗中低位局部进展期直肠癌的疗效[J].求医问药(下半月),2013(12):55-57. 被引量:9
  • 3戴冬秋.低位直肠癌使用吻合器重建消化道并发症发生的原因及对策[J].中国实用外科杂志,2004,24(9):530-532. 被引量:35
  • 4WHO handbook for reporting results of cancer treatment [M].Geneva (Switzerland):World Health Organization,1979.
  • 5Duffaud F,Therasse P.New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors[J].Bull Cancer,2000,87(12):869-870.
  • 6James K,Eisenhauer E,Christian M,et al.Measuring response in solid tumors:unidimensional versus bidimensional measurement[J].J Natl Cancer Inst,1999,91(6):523-528.
  • 7Mazumdar M,Smith A,Schwartz LH.A statistical simulation study finds discordance between WHO criteria and RECIST guideline[J].J Clin Epidemiol,2004,57(4):358-365.
  • 8Therasse P,Arbuck SG,Eisenhauer EA,et al.New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors [J].J Natl Cancer Inst,2000,92(3):179-181.
  • 9Werner-Wasik M,Xiao Y,Pequignot E,et al.Assessment of lung cancer response after nonoperative therapy:tumor diameter,bidimensional product,and volume.A serial CT sean-based study[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2001,51(1):56-61.
  • 10Prasad SR,Saini S,Sumner JE,et al.Radiological measurement of breast cancer metastases to lung and liver:comparison between WHO (bidimensional) and RECIST (unidimensional) guidelines [J].J Comput Assist Tomogr,2003,27(3):380-384.

共引文献260

同被引文献6

引证文献2

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部