期刊文献+

输尿管软镜碎石术和经皮肾镜碎石术用于肾结石并复杂尿路感染的效果对比 被引量:8

Effect comparison of flexible ureteroscopy lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal calculi combined with complicated urinary tract infection
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较输尿管软镜碎石术和经皮肾镜碎石术治疗肾结石并复杂尿路感染时的效果。方法选取2014年2月~2017年2月在我院治疗的110例肾结石并复杂尿路感染患者,随机分为观察组,各55例。观察组行输尿管软镜碎石术,对照组行经皮肾镜碎石术。比较两组的术中出血量、手术时间、住院时间、结石清除率、感染缓减率、并发症发生率以及T淋巴细胞亚群变化情况。结果观察组的术中出血量少于对照组,手术时间以及住院时间短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组的结石清除率和感染缓解率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组的术后并发症发生率为3.64%,显著低于对照组的16.36%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组手术前后的CD8^+水平比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组手术前后的CD3^+、CD4^+以及CD4^+/CD8^+水平比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。对照组术后1、24 h的CD3^+、CD4^+以及CD4^+/CD8^+水平显著低于术前,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),直到术后72后才恢复。结论相较于经皮肾镜碎石术,输尿管软镜碎石术虽然在结石清除率以及感染缓解率方面无显著优势,但其并发症发生率更低,损伤更小。 Objective To compare the efficacy of flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomyin the treatment of renal calculi combined with complicated urinary tract infection.Methods From February 2014 to February 2017,110 cases of renal calculi combined with complicated urinary tract infection in our hospital were select- ed and randomly divided into the observation group and the control group,55 cases in each group.The observation group was treated with flexible ureteroscope lithotripsyland the control group was treated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy. The intraoperative blood loss,operation time,hospitalization time,stone clearance rate,infection reduction rate,the incidence rate of complication and the change of T lymphocyte subsets were compared between the two groups.Results The amount of intraoperative blood loss in the observation group was less than that in the control group,and the operation time and hospitalization time in the observation group was shorter than that of the control group,with significant difference (P〈0.05).There was no significant difference between the two groups in the rate of stone clearance and the rate of infection remission (P〉0.O5).The incidence rate of postoperative complications in the observation group was 3.64%, which was significantly lower than 16.36% in the control group,with significant difference (P〈0.05).There was no signif- icant difference between the two groups before and after the operation in the level of CD8+(P〉0.05).There was no significant difference between before and after the operation in the observation group in the levels of CD3+,CD4+ and CD4+/ CD8+ (P〉0.05).The levels of CD3+,CD4+ and CD4+/CD8+ in the control group after the operation at 1 and 24 h was significantly lower than that before the operation,with significant difference (P〈0.05).The level of CD3+,CD4+ and CD4q CD8+ was recovered until 72 after operation.Conclusion Compared with percutaneous nephrolithotomy,flexible uretero- scopic lithotripsy has no significant advantage in the rate of stone clearance and the remission rate of infection,but the complication rate is lower and the injury is less.
出处 《中国当代医药》 2017年第19期57-60,共4页 China Modern Medicine
关键词 肾结石 尿路感染 输尿管软镜 经皮肾镜 Kidney calculi Urinary tract infection Flexible ureteroscope Percutaneous nephrolithotomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献67

  • 1程岩,李炯明,陈戬,刘建和,闫永吉,姜永明,张劲松.PNL钬激光碎石术治疗感染性肾结石(附63例报道)[J].微创泌尿外科杂志,2013,2(1):56-57. 被引量:5
  • 2李强,姚伟祥,陈凤婷,林宇峰,邹戈,李杰贤,王敏华.微通道经皮肾镜气压弹道碎石术术治疗感染性鹿角形肾结石[J].微创泌尿外科杂志,2014,3(5):290-295. 被引量:15
  • 3姜先洲,徐祗顺,董德鑫,陈军,王金.输尿管软镜下钬激光治疗妊娠期输尿管结石9例临床分析[J].中华外科杂志,2006,44(22):1574-1575. 被引量:11
  • 4Michel MS, Trojan L, Rassweiler JJ. Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Utol, 2007,51 : 899-906.
  • 5Osman M, Wendt-Nordahl G, Heger K, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy with ultrasonography-guided renal access:experience from over 300 eases. BJU Int, 2006, 96:875-878.
  • 6Wagenlehner FM, Weidner W, Naber KG. Optimal management of urosepsis from the urological perspective. Int J Antimicrob Agents, 2007,30:390-397.
  • 7Zanetti G, Paparella S, Trinchieri A, et al. Infections and urolithiasis: current clinical evidence in prophylaxis and antibiotic therapy. Arch hal Urol Androl, 2008, 80:5-12.
  • 8Wagenlehner FM, Weidner W, Naber KG. Optimal management of urosepsis from the urological perspective. Int J Antimierobial Agents, 2007,30:390-397.
  • 9Levy MM, Fink MP, Marshall JC, et al. 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference. Crit Care Med, 2003,31:1250-1256.
  • 10Abhishek, Kumar J, Mandhani A, et al. Pediatric urolithiasis: experience from a tertiary referral center [ J ]. J Pediat Urol, 2013,9(6 PtA) :825-830.

共引文献114

同被引文献67

引证文献8

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部