期刊文献+

形名配价关系的类型错配:一种认知语义学阐释

A Probe into the Type Mismatch in the Valence Relations of an Adj.+N. Combination:A Cognitive Semantic Perspective
下载PDF
导出
摘要 形容词—名词配价关系中的类型错配因其成分结构间的语义不兼容而吸引了学者们的关注。从认知语义学的百科知识观出发,运用侧重—活跃区分离原理,探讨形名配价关系中类型错配的成因。研究结果表明,类型错配的生成依托于人类的认知参照能力,借认知凸显度较高的实体作为参照物激活相关语义单位,从而使形式上的类型错配在概念上获得合理阐释。 Type mismatch in an adj. + n. combination has gained a lot of attention from researchers be- cause the component structures are usually found to be semantically incompatible while the meaning of the combination is perfectly coherent. Following the encyclopedic view of lexical semantics,this paper makes an analysis of the profile/active zone discrepancy in the adj. + n. combinations,aiming to investigate the causes of type mismatch. It is found that the conceptual integration in a type mismatch depends on our reference point ability,a capacity to mentally access one conceived entity through another with comparatively higher cognitive salience.
作者 谭梦玲
出处 《浙江外国语学院学报》 2017年第4期37-43,共7页 Journal of Zhejiang International Studies University
基金 电子科技大学中山学院校级教改项目"认知语言学视角下的翻译教学"(项目编号:JY201531)
关键词 配价关系 类型错配 侧重—活跃区分离 valence relations type mismatch profile/active zone discrepancy
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献65

  • 1熊仲儒.以“的”为核心的DP结构[J].当代语言学,2005,7(2):148-165. 被引量:112
  • 2陈宗利,王恒英.关系结构中的复指代词[J].外语教学,2007,28(4):29-33. 被引量:4
  • 3Barlow, Michael. A Situated Theory of Agreement [M]. New York: Garland, 1992.
  • 4Chafe, Wallace. Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing [M]. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1994.
  • 5Fauconnier, Gilles. Mental Spaces." Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language [M]. Cambridge,MA and London: MIT Press/Bradford, 1985.
  • 6Fauconnier, Gilles, and Mark Turner. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Minds Hidden Complexities [M]. New York: Basic Books, 2002.
  • 7Gensler, Orin D. Non-Syntactic Antecedents and Frame Semantics[A]. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting ofthe Berkeley Linguistics Society[Z]. 1977, 3:321-334.
  • 8Haiman, John. Dictionaries and Encyclopedias [J]. Lingua, 1980, 50: 329-357.
  • 9Hankamer, Jorge, and Ivan Sag. Deep and Surface Anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry, 1976, 7: 391-428.
  • 10Kovecses, Zoltan, and Gtinter Radden. Metonymy: Developing a Cognitive Linguistic View. Cognitive Linguistics, 1998, 9: 33-77.

共引文献48

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部