摘要
目的探讨雾化吸入与静脉给药治疗支气管哮喘的疗效对比。方法选取于2015年2月-2017年1月期间在我校门诊接受治疗的支气管哮喘患者142例,将其分为两组,参照组71例,采用静脉给药治疗,实验组71例,采用雾化吸入治疗。观察并对比两组患者的治疗效果。结果实验组患者的症状消失时间短于参照组,效果优于参照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论临床应用雾化吸入治疗支气管哮喘的方法更有效果,能够快速缓解患者症状,促进患者病情改善,值得推广应用。
Objective To investigate the curative effect of aerosol inhalation and intravenous therapy on bronchial asthma. Methods A total of 142 patients with bronchial asthma who were treated in our hospital from February 2015 to January 2017 were divided into two groups. The reference group was treated with intravenous therapy and 71 patients in the experimental group used inhalation therapy. Observed and compared the treatment effect of the two groups of patients. ResultsThe symptom disappeared in the experimental group was shorter than that in the reference group, the effect was better than the reference group, the difference was statistically significant(P 〈 0.05). ConclusionThe clinical application of aerosol inhalation in the treatment of bronchial asthma is more effective, can quickly relieve the symptoms of patients and improve the patient's condition, and it is worth promoting the application.
出处
《中国卫生标准管理》
2017年第14期67-69,共3页
China Health Standard Management
关键词
支气管哮喘
雾化吸入
静脉给药
疗效对比
bronchial Asthma
inhalation therapy
intravenous medication administration
effect comparison