摘要
"丝路带"与"欧亚盟"在战略定位、合作模式、开放程度、政治内涵等方面存在深层次差异。"欧亚盟"力求实现特定区域的一体化,"丝路带"则着眼于更广范围的跨区域经济合作,二者得以错位发展,避免冲突。"欧亚盟"遵循区域经济一体化模式,"丝路带"则灵活多元,二者形成互补。"丝路带"更为开放,能兼容和提升"欧亚盟"。"欧亚盟"有鲜明的地缘政治色彩,"丝路带"则探索全球治理新模式,二者能够相互协调。准确和充分把握二者的深层次差异,才能深化共识,为二者的对接寻求更广阔的空间、更切实可行的路径。
The Silk Road Economic belt and the EAEU have deep-seated differences in terms of strategicpositioning, cooperation model, degree of opening-up, and political implication. The EAEUstrives to achieve regional integration, while the Silk Road Economic Belt is focused on a widerrange of interregional economic cooperation. The two initiatives can focus on different areasand complement each other to achieve common development and avoid conflicts. The EAEUfollows the model of regional economic integration; the Silk Road Economic Belt is flexible anddiverse. They are complementary to each other. The Silk Road Economic Belt is more open andmay promote the development of the EAEU. While the EAEU has distinctive geopoliticalcharacteristics, the Silk Road Economic Belt explores a new model of global governance, andthey can coordinate with each other. The main objective of this article is to fully and accuratelygrasp the deep-seated differences between the two initiatives to seek more consensus andbroader space for cooperation.
出处
《国际经济评论》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第4期149-159,共11页
International Economic Review
基金
教育部留学基金委科研启动基金"俄罗斯东北亚研究"(教外司留[2014]1685号)
山东大学人文社会科学青年团队项目"俄罗斯政党变革与政党政治发展态势及其趋向研究"(项目编号:IFYT17050)
山东大学当代社会主义研究所资金资助"中国周边地缘政治格局与‘一带一路’国别政策研究"
