四论张生决非元稹之自寓——赵令畤《微之年谱》谬误举证

Discussion on the Opinion “Zhangsheng is not Prototype of Yuanzhen” for the Fourth Time: Proof of the Fallacy by Zhao Lingzhi in “Micro Chronicle”

自从元稹的《莺莺传》问世之后,"张生即元稹自寓"的观点就尾随而来,而随声附和者代有其人,其中也包括名家和大家。笔者是"张生即元稹自寓"观点的第一个否定者,1981年来先后发表《"张生即元稹自寓说"质疑》、《再论张生非元稹自寓》、《三论张生非元稹自寓》三篇文稿。本文则从"张生即元稹自寓"的最早源头:宋代赵令畤《微之年谱》的诸多错误着笔,四论张生决非元稹自寓的原观点,从另一个角度展开新的论证和新的讨论,同时拜请专家学者审正。

Since the publishing of Yingying, s biography, there comes the opinion that Zhangsheng is the prototype of Yuanzhen, and many people including some famous people agree to it. The author is the first person who denies the opinion that Zhangsheng is proto-type of Yuanzhen. Since 1981,“ the query of Zhangsheng is prototype of Yuanzhen” ,“Discussion on Zhangsheng is not Prototype of Yuanzhen for the Second Timer,, a Discussion on Zhangsheng is not Prototype of Yuanzhen for the Third Timer,three articles were pub-lished. This article starts with the source of opinion that Zhangsheng is prototype of Yuanzhen, writes some fallacies which come from “ Micro Chronicle” by Zhao Lingzhi in the Song dynasty,and discusses the opinion that Zhangsheng is not prototype of Yuanzhen for the fourth time. The new proof and discussion are developed from new perspective. The experts and scholars are invited to give some instructions.