论国内法院对国际投资仲裁的司法审查制度

Judicial Review of International Investment Arbitration by the Domestic Court

近年来国际社会发生多起国际投资仲裁被仲裁地国内法院撤销的案例,尤以尤科斯案最受关注。国际投资仲裁一方当事人是东道国政府,仲裁地国内法院审理以第三国政府为当事人的案件是否有违平等者间无管辖权原则,仲裁地国内法院以专设仲裁庭没有管辖权为由撤销裁决是否违背仲裁庭自裁管辖权原则,美国和欧盟就国际投资争端解决机制变革提出了不同主张,新一轮国际规则正在重构中。本文建议修订国内仲裁法以确立临时仲裁的法律地位,并将上海建设成世界级仲裁目的地。

Several international investment arbitration awards have been set aside by domestic courts of the place of arbitration in recent years,including particularly Yukos award,which arouses people's interest. As to whether the domestic court violates the principle of 'par in parem non habet jurisdictionem' with one party as the host government,and whether the domestic court violates the competence/competence doctrine,USA and EU have put forward different ideas. A new mechanism on investor-state dispute settlement is under reconstruction. It is suggested that we should amend the Chinese arbitral law and build Shanghai into one of the leading places of arbitration in the world.