期刊文献+

经肝动脉化疗栓塞术与肝切除术治疗巴塞罗那B期多发性肝细胞癌的近远期效果比较 被引量:2

Short-and long-term efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization versus liver resection in treatment of patients with Barcelona stage B multiple hepatocellular carcinoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对比研究经肝动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)与肝切除术治疗巴塞罗那临床肝癌(BCLC)分期B期的多发性肝细胞癌(HCC)的近远期疗效。方法回顾性分析2010年6月-2011年6月在武汉市中心医院接受治疗的80例BCLC B期多发性HCC患者的临床资料,其中,49例行肝切除术(LR组),31例行TACE(TACE组)。比较2组患者术后并发症、肝功能变化、生存时间及生存率。计量资料2组间比较采用t检验;计数资料2组间比较采用χ~2检验。采用Kaplan-Meier曲线进行生存分析,进一步比较采用log-rank检验。结果术后1周,LR组和TACE组的TBil、ALT、AST均较术前显著升高(LR组:t值分别为3.181、2.181、2.955,P值分别为0.002、0.032、0.004;TACE组:t值分别为3.109、3.965、4.519,P值分别为0.003、<0.001、<0.001),且术后LR组的AST及ALT显著低于TACE组(t值分别为2.094、2.111,P值分别为0.040、0.038)。LR组的1、3、5年生存率分别为75.51%、51.02%、40.82%,显著高于TACE组的61.29%、22.58%、9.68%(P值均<0.05);LR组的中位生存时间为36.3个月,明显长于TACE组的26.5个月(P<0.05)。LR组的复发率显著低于TACE组(30.61%vs 67.74%,χ~2=10.576,P=0.001)。结论肝切除术治疗BCLC期多发性HCC的疗效优于TACE,可提高患者总生存率并延长生存时间。 Objective To investigate the short-and long-term efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization(TACE) versus liver resection in the treatment of patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer(BCLC) stage B multiple hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).Methods A retrospective analysis was performed for the clinical data of 80 patients with BCLC stage B multiple HCC who were treated from June 2010 to June 2011,and among these patients,49 underwent liver resection(LR group) and 31 underwent TACE(TACE group).The postoperative complications,changes in liver function parameters,survival time,and 1-,3-,and 5-year survival rates were compared between the two groups.The t-test was used for comparison of continuous data between groups,and the chi-square test was used for comparison of categorical data between groups.The Kaplan-Meier curve was used for survival analysis,The log-rank test was used for conparison between two groups.Results At 1 week after surgery,the LR group and the TACE group had significant increases in total bilirubin,alanine aminotransferase(ALT),and aspartate aminotransferase(AST)(LR group:t=3.181,2.181,and 2.955,P=0.002,0.032,and 0.004;TACE group:t=3.109,3.965,and 4.519,P=0.003,P〈0.001,and P〈0.001),and after surgery,the LR group had significantly lower levels of AST and ALT than the TACE group(t=2.094 and 2.111,P=0.040 and 0.038).Compared with the TACE group,the LR group had significantly higher 1-,3-,and 5-year survival rates(75.51%/51.02%/40.82% vs 61.29%/22.58%/9.68%,all P〈0.05) and significantly longer median survival time(36.3 months vs 26.5 months,P〈0.05).The LR group had a significantly lower recurrence rate than the TACE group(30.61% vs 67.74%,χ^2=10.576,P=0.001).Conclusion Liver resection has a better effect in the treatment of patients with BCLC stage B multiple HCC than TACE and can improve overall survival and prolong survival time.
作者 黎昕 LI Xin.(Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Wuhan Central Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430014, China)
出处 《临床肝胆病杂志》 CAS 2017年第7期1296-1300,共5页 Journal of Clinical Hepatology
关键词 肝细胞 化学栓塞 治疗性 肝切除术 治疗结果 carcinoma hepatocellular chemoembolization therapeutic hepatectomy treatment outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献82

  • 1Sung Hoon Choi,Gi Hong Choi,Seung Up Kim,Jun Yong Park,Dong Jin Joo,Man Ki Ju,Myoung Soo Kim,Jin Sub Choi,Kwang Hyub Han,Soon Il Kim.Role of surgical resection for multiple hepatocellular carcinomas[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2013,19(3):366-374. 被引量:12
  • 2Marelli L, Stigliano R, Triantos C, et al. Transarterial therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma:which technique is more effective? A systematic review of cohort and randomized studies[J]. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol,2007,30(1):6-25.
  • 3Kim JH, Kim JIH, Choi JH, et al. Value of the model for end-stage liver disease for predicting survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with transarterial chemoembolization[J]. Scand J Gastroenterol, 2009, 44(3):346-357.
  • 4Cho YK, Chung JW, Kim JK, et al. Comparison of 7 staging systems for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing transarterial chemoembolization[J]. Cancer, 2008, 112(2):352-361.
  • 5Georgiades CS, Liapi E, Frangakis C, et al. Prognostic accuracy of 12 liver staging systems in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma treated with transarterial chemoembolization[J]. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2006, 17(10):1619-1624.
  • 6Chen CH, Hu FC, Huang GT, et al. Applicability of staging systems for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma is dependent on treatment method-Analysis of 2010 Taiwan Residents patients[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2009, 45(1 ): 1630-1639.
  • 7Bruix J, Sherman M, Llovet JM, et al. Clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Conclusions of the Barcelona- 2000 EASL Conference[J]. J Hepatol, 2001, 35(3):421-430.
  • 8Cillo U, Bassanello M, Vitale A, et al. The critical issue of hepatocellular carcinoma prognostic classification: which is the best tool available?[J]. J Hepatol, 2004, 40(1): 124-131.
  • 9Llovet JM, Bru C, Bruix J. Prognosis of hepatocelluar carcinoma:BCLC staging classification[J]. Semin Liver Dis,1999,19(3):329-337.
  • 10Llovet JM, Burroughs A, Bruix J. Hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Lancet, 2003, 362(9399):1907-1917.

共引文献61

同被引文献20

引证文献2

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部