摘要
关于船舶、航空器等特殊动产物权变动的生效要件,既不能类推适用一般动产物权变动的生效要件,也不能随意超越《物权法》第24条规定的字面涵义范围,把交付和登记作为特殊动产物权变动的生效要件。而应当按照"登记对抗"的立法宗旨进行目的解释,只有将当事人之间的意思表示作为特殊动产物权变动的生效要件,才能在特殊动产的多重买卖中出现"善意且对同一标的物享有物权利益"的多个买受人("善意第三人"),而为了解决"善意第三人"之间"物权利益"的冲突,《物权法》第24条规定的登记对抗的效力才能真正发挥规范作用。
The effective elements of the right change in the special movableproperty such as vessels,aircraft,are not simply analogous to those of theright change in the general movable property,nor does it refer to delivery andregistration as its effective elements beyond the literal meaning of Article 24 of Property Law. In accordance with the legislative purpose of registrationcounter,only when the intention of interested parties is taken as one of the effective elements of right change in the special movable property can more thanone third party " in good faith and with property right to the same subject" appearin multiple sales of the special movable property. To solve the conflict of realright interests between the third parties,the effect of the registrationcounter stipulated by Article 24 of Property Law really plays a role ofspecification.
出处
《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第4期111-123,共13页
Science of Law:Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
关键词
特殊动产交付
登记意思表示
第三人
登记对抗
Special movable property
Delivery or registration
Scope of the thirdparty
Registration counter