期刊文献+

达芬奇机器人与传统开腹手术在老年上腹部外科疾病中的应用比较 被引量:6

Da Vinci robot surgical system versus traditional open surgery for old patients with upper abdominal surgical diseases: a case control study
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的对达芬奇机器人手术系统与传统开腹手术在老年上腹部外科疾病中的应用进行对比。方法选择2015年2月至2016年7月在四川省人民医院治疗的老年上腹部外科疾病患者48例,分为机器人组23例和传统开腹组25例,比较两组患者的相关临床指标。结果机器人组麻醉时间和手术时间均较传统开腹组长[(194±16)min比(181±11)min,t=3.262,P:0.002;(167±14)min比(158±14)min,t=2.292,P=0.027],术中失血量少于传统开腹组[(128±62)ml比(190±86)m1.t=-2.886.P=0.006]。机器人组术后24h引流量[(69±27)ml比(114±54)ml,t=-3.680,P=0.001]、下床活动时间[(27.7±8.0)h比(35.7±9.9)h,t=-3.067.P=0.004]、行为疼痛量表评分、术后排气时间[(27.2±5.9)h比(32.8±8.3)h,t=-2.690,P=0.01]、住院时间[(10.4±1.8)d比(11.8±1.9)d,t=-2.600,P=0.013]均较传统开腹组有明显优势。机器人组住院费用较传统开腹组增高[(11.7±1.0)万元比(7.7±0.8)万元,t=15.087,P=0.000]。结论达芬奇机器人手术系统在减轻创伤、减少出血、缓解疼痛、术后快速康复、缩短住院时间方面均比开腹手术更有优势。 Objective To compare the clinical application of Da Vinci robot surgical system (RSS) with traditional open surgery (TOS). Methods From Feb 2015 to Jul 2016,48 cases of upper abdominal surgical disease patients were divided into RSS group (23 cases ) and TOS group (25 patients ) randomly. Results The anesthesia time [ (194 ±16 ) min vs. (181±11)min,t=3.262,P=0.002] and operation time [ ( 167± 14) rain vs. ( 158 ± 14 ) rain, t = 2. 292, P = 0. 027 ] were much longer in the RSS, while the blood loss during operation significantly less than the TOS [ ( 128 ± 62 ) ml vs. ( 190 ± 86 ) ml, t=- 2. 886, P = 0. 006 ]. The RSS has obvious advantages in 24 h-drainage [ ( 69 ± 27 ) ml vs. ( 114 ± 54 ) ml, t = - 3. 680,P = 0. 001 ], time to out-of-bed activity [ ( 27. 7 ± 8. 0) h vs. ( 35.7 ± 9. 9 ) h, t = - 3. 067, P = 0. 004 ], BPS, postoperative exhausting time[ (27.2 ± 5.9) b vs. ( 32. 8 ± 8. 3 ) h, t = - 2. 690, P = 0. 01 ] and length of hospital stay [ ( 10. 4 ± 1.8) d vs. ( 11.8 ± 1.9) d,t = - 2. 600,P = 0. 013 ]. But the total hospital cost was higher in RSS [ ( 117 0013 ±10 000) yuan vs. (77 000 ± 8 000 ) yuan, t = 15. 087, P = 0.000 ) 3. Conclusions The RSS is a much minimally invasive surgery, reducing blood loss and postoperative pain, promoting rapid recovery, shortening hospital stay.
出处 《中华普通外科杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2017年第7期595-597,共3页 Chinese Journal of General Surgery
关键词 机器人 老年人 外科手术 微创性 Robotics Aged Surgical procedures, minimally invasive
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献25

  • 1易为民,田秉璋,杨平洲,吴金术.医源性胆道损伤手术修复方式的探讨[J].中华普通外科杂志,2005,20(2):73-75. 被引量:38
  • 2蔡秀军,陈继达,周振旭,王先法,虞洪,梁霄,黄迪宇,郑雪咏.腹腔镜胆囊切除术胆管损伤的危险因素分析[J].中华普通外科杂志,2005,20(6):347-349. 被引量:48
  • 3王宏光,陈训如,罗丁,毛静熙,周正东,余少明,李胜宏.腹腔镜胆囊切除术13000例的并发症分析[J].中华普通外科杂志,2006,21(3):167-168. 被引量:94
  • 4张丰,郑民华.手术机器人在普通外科的应用[J].中国微创外科杂志,2007,7(6):570-572. 被引量:8
  • 5Cuschieri A , Jakimowioz JJ,Van Spreeuwel J. Laparoscopicdistal 70% pancreatectomy and splenectomy for chronicpancreatitis. Ann Surg, 1996,223 : 280-285.
  • 6Melvin WS, Needleman BJ, Krause KR,et al. Computer- enhanced robotic telesurgery. Surg Endosc, 2002, 16: 1790- 1792.
  • 7Giulianotti PC , Sbrana F, Bianco FM,et al. Robot-assistedlaparoscopic pancreatic surgery : single-surgeon experience. SurgEndosc, 2010, 24:1646-1657.
  • 8Waters JA , Canal DF , Wiebke EA,et al. Robotic distalpancreatectomy : cost effective? Surgery ,2010,148 :814-823.
  • 9Russo SM, Ove R,Saif MW, et al. Identification of prognosticand predictive markers in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: highlightsfrom the “2011 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium”. JPancreas ,2011,12:92-95.
  • 10Fernandez-Cruz L, Cosa R, Blanco L, et al. Curativelaparoscopic resection for pancreatic neoplasms : a criticalanalysis from a single institution. J Gastrointest Surg,2007 ,11:1607-1621.

共引文献87

同被引文献35

引证文献6

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部