期刊文献+

不同方式修复年轻恒磨牙牙体严重缺损的咬合功能评价 被引量:20

Evaluation of occlusal function of young permanent molars with serious dental defects repaired by different ways
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价两种不同方法修复年轻恒磨牙牙体严重缺损后的咬合功能恢复情况。方法:选取第一磨牙牙体严重缺损的7~11岁患者30名共30个牙,随机分为2组(n=15),分别进行树脂直接充填和金属预成冠修复。采用咬合分析仪在修复后即刻及修复后3、6个月对两组患者正中牙合的早接触及牙合力分布状况进行记录并分析其咬合功能恢复情况。结果:预成冠组和树脂充填组修复后即刻早接触发生分别为13例和1例(χ2=19.286,P<0.05);修复后3个月,早接触发生分别为5例和0例,6个月均为0,在修复后即刻、3个月及6个月树脂充填组牙合力百分比分别为19%、17%、22%,低于对侧(P<0.05);金属预成冠组分别为28%、25%、33%,稍低于对侧(P>0.05)。结论:牙体严重缺损的年轻恒磨牙选用金属预成冠修复在咬合功能的恢复上优于传统树脂充填术。 AIM To evaluate the occlusal function of young permanent molars with serious dental defects repaired by different ways. METHODS : 30 first permanent molars with serious dental defects in 30 patients aged 7 - 11 years were selected. The patients were randomly divided into 2 groups (n = 15). The defects were restored with pre-formed metal crown(PMC group) , resin and composite( RC group) respectively. The occlusal courses of each case was recorded by T - Scan IH system in intercuspal position. The premature contact and distribution of the occlusal force were examined. The recovery of occlusal function was analyzed. RESULTS : Right after treatment, the premature contact was found in 13 cases in PMC group and 1 case in RC group(P 〈0.05) , 3 months after restoration 5 and Q(P =0. 0 5 ) , 6 months after restoration 0 and 0(P 〉0. 05) , respectively. Right after treatment, 3 and 6 monthsafter restoration the percent of occlusal force of PMC group and RC group was 28% , 25% , 33% and 19% , 17% , 22% , respectively( be-tween 2 groups, P 〈 0. 05 ) . CONCLUSION : The PMC repair method is better than resin composite restoration for the recover of occlusal function of dental defect of young permanent molar.
出处 《牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志》 CAS 2017年第7期407-409,406,共4页 Chinese Journal of Conservative Dentistry
基金 2015年度广州市医药卫生科技一般引导项目(20151A010052)
关键词 年轻恒磨牙 牙体缺损 树脂充填 预成冠 young permanent molar dental defect resin composite restoration preformed metal crown
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献15

  • 1单湘芹.硬质树脂嵌体修复第1恒磨牙大面积缺损疗效观察[J].黑龙江医学,2005,29(6):481-481. 被引量:4
  • 2殷晓春.后牙复合树脂嵌体在牙体修复中的临床应用[J].牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志,2006,16(1):23-23. 被引量:7
  • 3van Dijken JW. Direct resin composite inlays/onlays: an 11 year follow-up. J Dent, 2000, 28(5) :299-306.
  • 4Yilmaz D, Gemalmaz D. Clinical evaluation of class Ⅱ Taros inlays: preliminary results after 1 year. J Oral Rehabil, 2003, 30(8) :855-860.
  • 5Manhart J, Scheibenbogen-Fuchsbrunner A, Chen HY,et al. A 2-year clinical study of composite and ceramic inlays. Clin Oral Investi,2000.4(4) : 192-198.
  • 6Lempel E, Toth V, Szalma J, et al. Clinical evaluation of a quality criteria system for ceramic inlay restorations. Fogorv Sz, 2006, 99( 1 ) :3-8.
  • 7Papthanasiou A, Bardwell D. Marginal adaptation of three class Ⅱ composite restorative techniques in vitro. J Mass Dent Soc,2001, 50(2) :30-32.
  • 8Peutzfeldt A. Effect of temperature and duration of pos-cure on in vitro wear and quantity of remaining double bonds of resins containing carboxylic anhydride. Eur J Oral Sci, 1995,103 (4) : 259-263.
  • 9Pongprueksa P, Kuphasuk W, Senawongse P. Effect of elastic cavity wall and occlusal loading on microleakage and dentin bond strength. Oper Dent ,2007,32 ( 5 ) :466-475.
  • 10Wassell RW, Walls AW, McCabe JF. Direct composite inlays versus conventional composite restorations: three-year clinical results. Br Dent J,1995, 179(9) : 343-349.

共引文献13

同被引文献138

引证文献20

二级引证文献84

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部