期刊文献+

电学领域实用新型专利保护客体探讨——功能模块1构架类型的装置权利要求 被引量:1

Exploration of Subject Matter of Patent Protection for Utility Model in the Electronic Field——Apparatus Claim with the Function Module Architecture
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文以一件典型的电学领域实用新型案例为例,对其审查过程进行剖析,找出当前审查政策的突破点,并从法理层面及技术层面对功能模块构架类型的装置权利要求的实质给出了一种合理的解释,最后结合案例进行更详细地解读,从而对功能模块构架类型装置权利要求寻求实用新型保护的可行性进行进一步的探讨。 This paper takes a typical case of utility model in the electronic field as an example, dissects its examination process, tries to find a breakthrough of the present examination policy, provides a reasonable explanation for the essence of the apparatus claim with the function module architecture from the legal level and technical level, and finally gives a detailed interpretation combining with a specific case, thus further explores the feasibility of seeking patent protection for utility model for the apparatus claim with the function module architecture.
作者 陈丽娜
出处 《中国发明与专利》 2017年第7期101-104,共4页 China Invention & Patent
关键词 微创新 功能模块构架 实用新型 保护客体 micro-innovation function module architecture utility model subject matter of patent protection
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献15

  • 1In re Alappat, 33 F.3d 1526(1994), ARCHER dissenting.
  • 2Donald S. Chisum, Michael A. Jaeobs, Understanding Intellectual Property Law, Matthew Bender, 1992,§2C[1][a] 2-20).
  • 3Dan L. Burk, Patenting Speech, 79 Tex. L. Rev. 99, 144 (2000).
  • 4In re Miller, 418 F.2d 1392(1969).
  • 5In re Jones, 373 F.2d 1007(1967).
  • 6Pamela Samuelson, Benson Revisited: The Case Against Patent Protection For Algorithms And Other Computer Program-Related Inventions ,39 Emory L.J. 1025, 1128 (1990).
  • 7Diamond v. Diehr, 450 U.S, 175(1981).
  • 8Richard H. Stem, An Attempt to Rationalize Floppy Disk Claims, 17 J, Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 183, 194(1998).
  • 9Gottschalk v. Benson, 409 U.S. 63(1972).
  • 10" A program is a program is a program" 引自 In re Noll, 545 F,2d 141,148(1976).

共引文献11

同被引文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部