期刊文献+

电子废弃物非正规回收查处政策及其效果 被引量:9

Detecting and Punishing Policy on Informal Recycling of the E-Waste and Its Effects
下载PDF
导出
摘要 建立了包括政府、正规和非正规回收者在内的两阶段动态三方博弈模型研究电子废弃物非正规回收查处政策。研究表明,最优查处力度与回收者的技术经济水平、回收市场条件、用于查处支出的专项预算以及政府的查处能力等因素有关,政府应根据上述具体情况制定最优查处政策。研究也发现,查处政策具有双面作用,一方面,可以降低正规、非正规回收价格,减轻正规回收者与非正规回收者竞争的压力,从而使正规回收数量增加、正规回收率提高;另一方面,使非正规回收的减少量大于正规回收的增加量,从而使得总回收量减少,导致较多电子废弃物滞留在消费者手中,不利于循环经济的实现。因此,查处政策不宜单一执行,而应与其他政策配合使用。 We construct a wo-stage game model with a government, a formal and an informal recycler to study the detecting and punishing policy for informal recycling of the e-waste. We show that the optimal detecting effort should be developed according to the technical and economic levels of recyclers, the recycling market conditions, the government's budget and detecting ability. We also show that the policy has two side effects. On the one hand, it decreases the recycling prices, lightens the formal recycler's competitive pressure, and increases the amount of e-waste formally recycled and the formal recycling rate. On the other hand, it makes the reduced amount of e-waste informally recycled more than the raised amount of e-waste formally recycled, and reduces the total amount of e-waste recycled, resulting in more e- waste hold, and delaying the realization of circular economy. Therefore, the policy is not suitable for sole used but for conjunction with other policies.
作者 谢天帅
出处 《系统管理学报》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2017年第4期722-727,共6页 Journal of Systems & Management
基金 重庆市科学技术委员会自然科学基金资助项目(cstcjj2011A00021) 重庆市教育委员会人文社科基金资助项目(10SKF12)
关键词 电子废弃物 正规回收者 非正规回收者 查处政策 政策效果 electronic waste formal recycler informal recycler detecting and punishing policy policy effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献171

共引文献188

同被引文献71

引证文献9

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部