糖尿病教育者培训效果及其影响因素的调查研究

Effects of China diabets educator training and its influencing factors

目的对我国糖尿病教育者培训后的效果进行调查,并分析其影响因素,旨在为完善糖尿病教育者的考核认证模式提供依据。方法选择2008年—2014年参加糖尿病学院培训并通过考核的314名糖尿病教育者,采用自行设计的培训考核表进行调查。结果考核总分为(76.64±22.24)分,得分最高的前3个项目为开展护士培训(93.36±62.81)分,健康教育形式(84.27±23.09)分和教育者工作职责及流程(82.07±32.43)分,<60分的项目依次为随访管理(56.16±31.74)分,发表论文(38.47±47.75)分和参与科研(26.11±44.00)分。多元线性回归分析发现糖尿病专科工作年限(t=3.515,P=0.001)、是否在糖尿病教育者岗位工作(t=3.404,P=0.001)和是否为一线医务工作者(t=-2.589,P=0.001)是考核成绩的影响因素。结论糖尿病教育者常规教育工作得分较高,科研相关工作得分较低;糖尿病专科工作时间长、在糖尿病教育者岗位工作和非一线医务工作者的考核得分较高。

Objective To describe the effects of China diabetes educator training and explore the influencing factors. Methods Totally 314 diabetes educators who graduated from Johnson ＆ Johnson Diabetes Institute（JJDI） from 2007 to 2014 were recruited and investigated via self-designed evaluation form. Results The total score was 76.64±22.24. The top three items with highest scores were performing nurses training （93.36±62.81）,form of health education （84.27±23.09） and working responsibility and procedure of diabetes educator （82.07±32.43）. The items scored lower than 60 were regular follow-up system （56.16±31.74）, publishing health education papers （38.47 ±47,75） and conducting related researches （26.11±44.00）. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that educators who had longer time of working in diabetes department（t=3.515,P=0.001） and whose post were educators（t=3.404,P=O.001） and who were not first line practitioners （t=-2.589,P=O.O01） had higher scores. Conclusion The educators＇ main work in China is focusing on regular health education. Follow-up management and research renovation capacity should be enhanced in the future for educators.