期刊文献+

高度轴性近视白内障伴后巩膜葡萄肿患者眼轴的测量 被引量:6

Axial length measurements in high axial myopia patients with cataract and posterior staphyloma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较研究高度轴性近视白内障伴后巩膜葡萄肿患者的眼轴测量方式。方法纳入高度轴性近视白内障伴有黄斑区后巩膜葡萄肿的患者进行研究,共48例(72只眼),分别采用IOL-Master、注视下接触式A型超声和普通接触式A型超声测量其眼轴,并依据IOL-Master测量值将眼轴分为A段(26.0~28.0 mm)和B段(≥28 mm),比较各种方式测量下眼轴的差异。结果 A型超声测量眼轴长度较IOL-Master的测量值短,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05或0.01)。在注视下接触式A型超声测量中,A段与IOL-Master测量的差值较B段眼轴段的测量差值小,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。在普通接触式A型超声测量中,A段与IOL-Master测量的差值较B段的测量差值小(P<0.01)。结论 A型超声和IOL-Master在测量高度轴性近视白内障伴有黄斑区后巩膜葡萄肿患者的眼轴时,测量值存在差异,但是注视下接触式和普通接触式A型超声测量之间无明显差异。 Objective To compare the methods of axis length measurement in high axial myopia patients with cata- ract and posterior staphyloma. Methods 48 cases (72 eyes ) of high axial myopia patients with cataract and posterior staphyloma were included. Axial length was accessed by IOL-Master, gazing contact A-scan, and regular contact A-scan. Based on the results from IOL-Master, A segment ( 26.0 - 28.0 mm) and B segment ( 〉28 ram) were defined. The differences between 3 methods were analyzed. Results Axial length measured by A-scan was shorter than that by IOL- Master, and this difference was significant ( P 〈 0.01 ). Difference in A-segment between gazing contact A-scan and IOL- Master was smaller than the difference in B segment ( P 〈 0. 01 ). Similarly, difference in A-segment between regular con- tact A-scan and IOL-Master was smaller than the difference in B segment ( P 〈 O. 01 ). Conclusions Measurements of axial length in high axial myopia patients with cataract and posterior staphyloma were significantly different between A-scan and IOL-Master. Gazing contact A-scan and regular contact A-scan were similar.
作者 龙波 赵国平
机构地区 解放军
出处 《临床眼科杂志》 2017年第4期325-327,共3页 Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology
关键词 高度轴性近视 白内障 后巩膜葡萄肿 眼轴 测量方式 High axial myopia Cataract Posterior staphyloma Axial length Measurement mode
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献27

  • 1蔡余兴,朱静玲,冯伟.巩膜后葡萄肿的超声诊断与分型[J].中国超声医学杂志,1996,12(11):63-65. 被引量:2
  • 2沈一,刘晓玲,方海珍.近视眼黄斑区视网膜厚度与眼轴的相关性研究[J].中华眼底病杂志,2006,22(6):397-399. 被引量:12
  • 3Hoffer KJ. The Hoffer Q formula: a comparison of theoretic and regression formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg, 1993,19:700-712.
  • 4Bhatt AB, Schefler AC, Feuer WJ, et aL Comparison of predictions made by the intraocular lens master and ultrasound biometry. Arch Ophthalmol, 2008,126:929-933.
  • 5Connors RIII, Boseman PIII, Olson RJ. Accuracy and reproducibility of biometry using partial coherence interferometry. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2002, 28 : 235-238.
  • 6Kielhorn I, Rajan MS, Tesha PM, et al. Clinical assessment of the Zeiss lOLMaster. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2003,29:518-522.
  • 7Rose LT, Moshegov CN. Comparison of the Zeiss IOLMaster and applanation A-scan ultrasound: biometlT for intraocular lens calculation. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol, 2003,31:121-124.
  • 8Vogel A, Dick HB, Krummenauer F. Reproducibility of optical biometry using partial coherence interferometry: intraobserver andinterobserver reliability. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2001,27 : 1961- 196g.
  • 9Wylegala E, Ludyga A. Partial coherent intefferometry: an alternative method for intraocular lens power calculation performed by ultrasono-raphv. Klin Oczna, 2004,106:325-327.
  • 10Nemeth J, Fekete 0, Pesztenlehrer N. Optical and ultrasound measurement of axial length and anterior chamber depth for intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2003, 29:85-88.

共引文献12

同被引文献63

引证文献6

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部