审前羁押与拘、捕分离的比较研究

A Comparative Study on the Separation of Pretrial Custody and Arrest

审前羁押因对人身自由进行限制而被认为是最严厉的强制措施。该文通过对比中德两国对审前羁押的不同操作,论证以国家为核心的诉讼本位是导致我国审前羁押依附于逮捕,不经严格的司法审查程序便可适用的根本原因。为消除刑诉法与宪法对检察院职权的不同规定,实现公民本位的价值目标,需将审前羁押作为独立的强制措施,循序渐进地以司法审查和司法救济为切入点进行审前羁押的改革。

Pretrial custody is treated as the most severe compulsory measures because of the limitation of personal freedom. Comparing the operation of Germany with China is to demonstrate the phenomenon that pretrial custody depending on arrest, of which reason is paying too much attention on the interests of country. In order to achieve the attachment with the standard of international personal rights, pretrial custody should be changed into an independent compulsory measures. And a tight legal control and reasonable judicial remedy should be constructed, which will help the improvement of pretrial custody.