期刊文献+

哌拉西林钠/他唑巴坦钠治疗支气管扩张合并铜绿假单胞菌感染效果 被引量:7

The Effect of Piperacillin Sodium/Tazobactam Sodium in the Treatment of Bronchiectasis Complicated by Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Infection
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨哌拉西林钠/他唑巴坦钠治疗支气管扩张合并铜绿假单胞菌感染效果。方法选取2012年1月—2016年12月诊断为支气管扩张合并铜绿假单胞菌感染入我院治疗的患者192例作为研究对象,将其随机分为治疗组(哌拉西林钠/他唑巴坦钠4.5 g,3次/天,静滴)与对照组(阿莫西林钠/克拉维酸钾1.2 g,3次/天,静滴),疗程均10~14 d。对比两组患者的治疗效果。结果治疗组的总有效率91.7%,高于对照组(75.0%),差异有统计学意义(z=2.980,P=0.003);治疗组患者的不良反应发生率3.13%,低于对照组(4.17%),差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.194,P=0.659)。结论哌拉西林钠/他唑巴坦钠对支气管扩张合并铜绿假单胞菌感染的临床疗效好,不良反应少。 Objective To investigate the efficacy of piperacillin sodium/ tazobactam sodium in the treatment of bronchiectasis complicated with pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. Methods 192 cases from January 2012 to December 2016 who were diagnosied bronchiectasis complicated with pseudomonas aeruginosa infection were randomly divided into treatment group (piperacillin sodium/tazobactam sodium, 4.5 g, 3 times/day, intravenous drip) and control group (amoxicillin sodium/clavulanate potassium, 1.2 g, 3 times/day intravenous drip), the treatment lasted for 10-14 d. The therapeutic effects of the two groups were compared. Results The total effective rate of the treatment group was 91.7%, higher than that of the control group (75.0%), and the difference was statistically significant (z=2.980, P=0.003). The incidence of adverse reactions in the treatment group was 3.13%, which was lower than that in the control group (4.17%), and the difference was not statistically significant (Z2=0.194, P=0.659). Conclusion Piperacillin sodium/tazobactam sodium is effective and less harmful in the treatment of bronchiectasis combined with pseudomonas aeruginosa infection.
作者 蒋昭丹
出处 《中国继续医学教育》 2017年第15期156-158,共3页 China Continuing Medical Education
关键词 哌拉西林钠 铜绿假单胞菌 支气管扩张 piperacillin sodium pseudomonas aeruginosa bronchiectasis
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献87

  • 1卢建华,黄国孟,李淑霞,伍慧红.急诊重症监护病房呼吸机相关性肺炎的临床与病原学研究[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2007,17(6):654-656. 被引量:74
  • 2Cook D. Ventilator associated pneumonia: perspectives on the Burden o~ illness [J], Intensive Care Med, 2000, 26 Suppl: s31-s37.
  • 3Morehead RS , Pinto SJ. Ventilator-associate pneumonia[J]. Arch Intern Med ,2000,160(13) : 1926-1936.
  • 4Chevret S, Hemmer M, Carlet J,et al. Incidence and risk fac- tors of pneumonia acquired in intensive care units[J] Inten sire Care Med, 1993,19(5):256-264.
  • 5Rello J, Ollendorf DA, Oster G, et al. Epidemiology and outcomes of ventilator-associated pneumonia in a large US da- tabase[J]. Chest,2002, 122(6): 2115-2121.
  • 6Vincent J L,Lobo S, Struelens M. Ventilator associated pneu- monia:risk factor and preventive measures[J]. J Chemother, 2001,I3(1) :211-217.
  • 7Barker AF. Bronchiectasis. N Engl J Med, 2002,346: 1383- 1393.
  • 8Seitz AE, Olivier KN, Steiner CA, et al. Trends and burden of bronchieetasis-associated hospitalizations in the United States,1993-2006. Chest, 2010,138:944-949.
  • 9Tsang KW, Lain SK, Lam WK, et al. High seroprevalence of Helicobacter pylori in active bronchiectasis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 1998, 158: 1047-1051.
  • 10Li AM, Sonnappa S, Lex C, et al. Non-CF bronchiectasis: does knowing the aetiology lead to changes in management? Eur Resp J, 2005,26 : 8-14.

共引文献358

同被引文献61

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部