期刊文献+

右心室主动电极与被动电极即刻起搏参数的临床研究 被引量:2

A Comparative Study about Pacing Paramerers Between Active Lead and Passive Lead
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨右心室主动电极起搏与被动电极起搏二者之间起搏参数的差异。方法:永久心脏起搏器患者186例,其中93例为右室间隔部主动电极起搏,93例为右室心尖部被动电极起搏,于植入时测试单极起搏阈值、感知及阻抗,所有患者的起搏脉宽均为0.42ms。结果:有效起搏时主动电极组与被动电极组比较起搏阈值无显著差异(1.19±0.25 vs 0.98±0.25)V(P>0.05),被动电极组感知显著高于主动电极组感知(8.57±5.08 vs 7.69±4.21)mV(P<0.05),被动电极组阻抗显著高于主动电极组阻抗(718.60±239.50 vs 656.88±165.47)Ω(P<0.05)。结论:被动电极即刻感知优于主动电极,阻抗则高于主动电极。 Objective To investigate the difference between the use of the active lead lines and the passive lead lines.Methods 186 cases of pacemaker patients were divided into 2 groups,93 cases of pacemaker patients were implanted the active lead lines,93 cases of pacemaker patients were implanted the passive lead lines,and test the pacing threshold,sensing and impedance,The pacing pulse width are 0.42ms.Results The pacing threshold between the two groups had no significant difference(1.19±0.25 vs 0.98±0.25)V(P>0.05),the pacing sensing in the passive leads were higher(8.57±5.08 vs 7.69±4.21)mV(P<0.05).the pacing impedance in the passive leads group were also higher than the active leads group(718.6 ± 239.5 vs 656.9 ± 165.5) Ω(P<0.05).Conclusion The pacing sensing of the passive leads was better than the active leads.
出处 《湖南师范大学学报(医学版)》 2010年第1期26-28,共3页 Journal of Hunan Normal University(Medical Sciences)
关键词 主动电极 被动电极 阈值 感知 阻抗 active lead passive lead pacemaking threshold sensitivity threshold pacemaking impedance
  • 相关文献

同被引文献25

  • 1植入性心脏起搏器治疗:目前认识和建议(2010年修订版)[J].中国继续医学教育,2011,3(11):40-54. 被引量:13
  • 2Beck H, Boden WE, Patibandla S, et al. 50th Anniversary of the first successful permanent pacemaker implantation in the United States: historical review and future directions [J]. Am J Cardiol, 2010,15;106(6) :810 -818.
  • 3Epstein AE, Baker JH 2nd, Beau SL, et al. Performance of the St. Jude Medical Riata leads [ Jl. Heart Rhythm, 2009,6 (2) : 204 - 209.
  • 4Palmisano P, Accogli M, Zaccaria M, et al. Rate, causes, and impact on patient outcome of implantahle device complications re- quiring surgical revision: large population survey from two centres in Italy [J]. Europace, 2013,15(4) :531 -540.
  • 5Crossley GH. Cardiac pacing leads [ Jl. Cardiol C1in,2000, 18 (1) :95 -112.
  • 6Yee R, Gadler F, Hussin A, et al. Novel active fixation mecha- nism permits precise placement of a left ventricular lead : Early re- suits from a multicenter clinical study [ J ]. Heart Rhythm, 2014, 11(7) :1150- 1155.
  • 7Rickard J, Taborsky M, Bello D,et al. Short - and long - term electrical performance of the 5086 MRI pacing lead [ J ]. Heart Rhythm, 2014,11 (2) :222 - 229.
  • 8Epstein AE, DiMarco JP, Ellenbogen KA, et al. 2012 ACCF/ AHA/HRS focused update incorporated into the ACCF/AHA/ HRS 2008 guidelines for device - based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society [ J]. J Am Coll Cardi- ol, 2013,61(3) :e6 -e75.
  • 9Ghani A, Delnoy PP, Ramdat Misier AR, et 81. Incidence of lead dislodgement, malfunction and perforation during the first year following device implantation [ J ]. Neth Heart J, 2014,22 (6) : 286 - 291.
  • 10Ohlow MA, Lauer B, Brunelli M, et al. Incidence and predictors of pericardial effusion after permanent heart rhythm device im- plantation: prospective evaluation of 968 consecutive patients [J]. CircJ, 2013,77(4):975-981.

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部