摘要
在互联网技术突变的时代背景下,知识产权领域所移植的他国制度存在在我国后续融入以及发展问题。我国著作权法上"通知-移除"规则移植借鉴于美国的《千禧年数字版权法》,在适用的过程中却产生了不同于美国的问题。在美国,权利人利用该规则打击侵权过度以致滥用,而我国的问题是网络服务提供者配合不足以致打击侵权不利。对制度来源国司法实践新发展的盲目引进可能与我国既有的法律制度冲突,并且不能解决我国司法实践中真正存在的问题。我们需要观察理解我国司法实践中存在的真正问题,有效整合包括本土的司法经验和学术积累在内的多种学术资源,进行有效的知识产出,发展相关制度,使移植来的制度更好地融入我国的法律体系与实践。
In the Intemet era, the transplantation of IP system from foreign countries into the Chinese law needs further embedment and development. The "notice-takedown" rule of Chinese Copyright Law was borrowed from the US DMCA, however it generates different problems from that happened in US. In the US, this rule is abused by fight owners in that it strikes the infi'ingement beyond the necessary scope. While in China, the insufficient cooperation by network service provider leads to insufficient crackdown of infringement. Blindly import new development of judicial practices to China may cause legal confliction, and unable to solve the real problems in Chinese judicial practices. It is recommended to observe the genuine problems existing in Chinese judicial practices, integrate all kinds of judicial and academic resources throughout the world, in order to provide effective systems and healthy transplantation of foreign system into China's legal system and practices.
出处
《知识产权》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第7期44-50,共7页
Intellectual Property
基金
重庆市科学技术委员会"知识产权法院建设相关问题及对策研究"项目支持
关键词
“通知-移除”规则
法律移植
网络服务提供者
反通知
虚假陈述
notice-takedown rule
legal transplantation
internet service provider
counter notice
misrepresentation