期刊文献+

“仁爱”与“正义”:和解及其可能 被引量:6

下载PDF
导出
摘要 利他的"仁爱"中可有己、利、私,维护权利的"正义"中亦可有"仁爱"。"正义"与"仁爱"有两种和解方式:化主观"仁爱"为客观制度"正义","正义"与"仁爱"各在其所、互补共生。"仁爱"系个人美德,温润私人领域,"正义"系社会制度美德,维系社会政治秩序。"正义"为"仁爱"提供背景性框架,有"仁爱"美德者在公共政治生活领域维护"正义"秩序及其持续再生产。
作者 高兆明
出处 《伦理学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第4期29-35,共7页 Studies in Ethics
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献22

  • 1Rodney G. Peffer , "The Relevance of John Rawls", prseented at the 20^th World Congress of Philosophy, Boston, Massachusetts, U. S. A., August 10-16, 1998.
  • 2John Rawls, Political Liberalism, New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.
  • 3John Rawls, A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1971, p. 302.
  • 4Rodney, G. Peffer, Marxism, Morality, and Social Justice, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1990, p. 418.
  • 5for instance, Ralph L. Keeney and Howard Raiffa, Decision with Muluple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs, New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1976, pp. 219-353.
  • 6Ronald Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously, Cambridge, Massa chusetts: Harvard University Press, 1977, p. 153.
  • 7Michael J. Sandel, "Justice and the Good", in Liberalism and Its Critics. ed. Michael J. Sandel, New York, NY: New York University Press, 1984, pp. 159-176.
  • 8Joel Feinborg, Social Philosophy, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1973, p. 93.
  • 9C. L. Sheng ,"A Defense of Utilitarianism Against Rights Theory", in The American Constitutional Experiment, ed. David M. Speak and Creighton Peden, Lewiston, New York: The Edwin Mellen Press, 1991, pp. 269-299.
  • 10C. L. Sheng, "Utilitarianism Is Not Indifferent to Distritiution", in Rights, Justice, and Community, ed. Creighton Peden and John Roth, Lewiston, New York: The Edwin Mellen Press, pp. 363-377.

共引文献5

同被引文献19

引证文献6

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部