期刊文献+

Tp-e离散度对变异型心绞痛患者恶性室性心律失常的预测作用 被引量:11

Prognostic value of Tpeak-Tend dispersion for malignant arrhythmia events in patients with vasospastic angina
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:评价T波峰点到末端的间期(Tpeak-Tend interval,Tp-e间期)和其他心电图参数对变异型心绞痛(VA)患者恶性室性心律失常(MVAE)发生的预测作用。方法:60例单纯VA患者(无MVAE组)和18例VA合并MVAE的患者(MVAE组)入选本研究。使用t检验、Logistic回归分析和受试者工作曲线(ROC)分析ST段抬高时期心电图参数和MVAE(室性心动过速/心室颤动、晕厥和成功复苏的心源性猝死)发生的关系。结果:MVAE组比无MVAE组有更长的校正QT间期离散度[cQTd:(49.55±15.4)ms∶(39.98±7.4)ms;P=0.017]、校正的Tp-e间期[cTp-e:(162.07±24.8)ms∶(127.69±12.9)ms;P<0.001]和校正的Tp-e间期离散度[cTp-ed:(55.55±15.4)ms∶(39.98±7.4)ms;P<0.001],并且有更大的Tp-e/QT比值(0.355±0.05∶0.297±0.03;P<0.001)。血管痉挛缓解并且抬高的ST段和倒置的T波恢复至正常水平后,两组间QTc间期、cQTd、cTp-e间期、cTp-ed和Tp-e/QT比值均没有明显差异。单因素回归分析显示,cQTd(OR=1.117,95%CI:1.013~1.230,P=0.026)、cTp-e间期(OR=1.149,95%CI:1.057~1.248,P=0.001)、Tp-e/QT比值(OR=1.361,95%CI:1.136~1.630,P=0.002)和cTp-ed(OR=1.452,95%CI:1.150~1.832,P=0.001)均与MVAE的发生有关。多因素逐步回归分析显示,只有cTp-ed可以进入回归方程作为预测因子。ROC曲线下面积(AUC)cQTd为0.724,cTp-e间期为0.841,Tp-e/QT比值为0.924,cTp-ed为0.933(均P<0.05)。Z检验显示,cTp-ed(0.933)的AUC与cQTd(0.724)、cTp-e间期(0.841)、Tp-e/QT比值(0.924)的AUC相比均有显著差异(均P<0.05),Tp-e/QT比值的AUC与cQTd相比有显著差异(均P<0.05)。结论:cQTd、cTp-e间期、Tp-e/QT比值和cTp-ed在合并MVAE的VA患者中明显增高,均可预测MVAE的发生,其中cTp-ed是最敏感的独立预测因子。 Objective:To evaluate the value of Tpeak-Tend interval(Tp-e interval)and other ECG parameters as risk factors for recurrence of malignant ventricular arrhythmia events(MVAE)in patients with variant angina(VA).Method:Sixty patients with VA and 18 patients with VA complicated with MVAE were enrolled.The relationship of ST-segment elevation phase and MVAE(defined as ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation,syncope,aborted sudden death)was analyzed by t test,Logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve analysis.Result:Patients in MVAE group showed greater corrected QT dispersion [cQTd:(49.55±15.4)ms vs.(39.98±7.4)ms;P=0.017),corrected Tp-e interval[cTp-e:(162.07±24.8)ms vs.(127.69±12.9)ms;P0.001]),and corrected Tp-e interval dispersion[cTp-ed:(55.55±15.4)ms vs.(39.98±7.4)ms;P0.001],and Tp-e/QT ratio(0.355±0.05 vs.0.297±0.03;P0.001)than those in non-MVAE group.After symptoms relieved and elevated ST-segment and reversed T waves were back to normal,there was no significant difference in QTc interval,cQTd,cTp-e interval,cTp-ed and Tp-e/QT ratio between the two groups.Univariate analysis showed that cQTd(OR=1.117,95%CI:1.013-1.230;P=0.026),cTp-e(OR=1.149,95%CI:1.057-1.248,P=0.001),Tp-e/QT(OR=1.361,95%CI:1.136-1.630,P=0.002)and cTp-ed(OR=1.452,95%CI:1.150-1.832,P=0.001)were significantly associated with MVAE.Multivariate analysis showed that cTp-ed remained as a predictor of MVAE.ROC curve analysis showed that AUC of cQTd was 0.724,cTp-e interval was 0.841,Tp-e/QT ratio was 0.924 and cTp-ed was 0.933(all P0.05).The AUC of Tp-e/QT ratio was significant different with that of cQTd.Conclusion:cQTd,cTp-e interval,Tp-e/QT ratio and cTp-ed are significantly increased in VA patients with MVAE than those without MAE when coronary spasm is onset.Prolonged cTp-ed is the best discriminator and a strong independent predictor of MVAE in VA patients.
出处 《临床心血管病杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2017年第7期657-661,共5页 Journal of Clinical Cardiology
关键词 QT间期离散度 TP-E间期 Tp-e/QT比值 Tp-e间期离散度 心绞痛 室性心律失常 QT dispersion Tp-e interval Tp-e/QT ratio Tp-e dispersion variant angina malignant ven tricular arrhythmia events
  • 相关文献

同被引文献75

引证文献11

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部