期刊文献+

彩色多普勒闪烁伪像诊断膀胱结石临床价值的研究 被引量:3

The diagnostic value of the twinkling artifact in bladder stone
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨彩色多普勒闪烁伪像诊断膀胱结石的临床价值。方法选取经CT检查证实的膀胱单发结石患者132例,运用二维超声测量结石大小并进行分组,观察并记录各组结石后方声影显示情况,应用彩色多普勒超声观察并记录各组结石后方闪烁伪像显示情况,对显示率进行统计分析。结果 132例膀胱结石声影显示率为72.7%,闪烁伪像显示率为84.8%,差异有统计学意义。A组(d≤10mm)膀胱结石共40例,声影显示率为42.5%、闪烁伪像显示率为80.0%,差异有统计学意义;B组(11mm≤d≤20mm)膀胱结石共65例,声影显示率为86.2%、闪烁伪像显示率为86.2%,差异无统计学意义;C组(d≥21mm)膀胱结石共27例,声影显示率为85.2%、闪烁伪像显示率为88.9%,差异无统计学意义。结论彩色多普勒闪烁伪像诊断膀胱结石具有重要意义,尤其对于诊断较小膀胱结石更具临床价值。 Objective To evaluate the diagnostic value of the twinkling artifact in bladder stone.Methods A total of 132 patients with single bladder stones were enrolled in the study from February 2015 to December 2016.All bladder stones were confirmed by non-contrast helical computerized tomography.The bladder stones were classified into grades according to stone size.The acoustic shadowing (AS) and twinkling artifact (TA) level of bladder stones were confirmed with gray-scale imaging and CDFI.The incidence of AS and TA was comparatively analyzed.Results There was significant difference in the incidence between the AS(72.7%) and TA(84.8%) of 132 bladder stones(P〈0.05).A significant difference in the incidence was observed between the AS(42.5%) and TA(80.0%) of the bladder stones in grade A(d≤10 mm)(P〈0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence between the AS(86.2%) and TA(86.2%) of the bladder stones in grade B(11 mm≤d≤20 mm), and between the AS(85.2%) and TA(88.9%) of the bladder stones in grade C(d≥21 mm)(P〉0.05).Conclusion The twinkling artifact is useful in the diagnosis of bladder stone, especially in small stone.
出处 《医学影像学杂志》 2017年第7期1327-1329,共3页 Journal of Medical Imaging
关键词 闪烁伪像 膀胱结石 超声检查 Twinking artifact Bladder stone Ultrasound
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献23

  • 1徐庆翠.前列腺增生患者围手术期的健康教育[J].护理实践与研究,2007,4(10):80-81. 被引量:4
  • 2李天,李逊,袁坚,曾国华,单炽昌,刘永达,钟东亮.70岁以上老年人前列腺增生症合并膀胱结石的腔内手术效果评价[J].中国内镜杂志,2007,13(5):463-465. 被引量:10
  • 3喻俊峰,颜克均,李爱军,刘昌荣,王进.膀胱大力碎石钳配合气压弹道碎石治疗膀胱大结石25例[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2007,16(30):4480-4480. 被引量:5
  • 4Rahmouni A, Bargoin R, Herment A, et al. Color Doppler twinkling artifact in hyperechoic regions [ J ]. Radiology, 1996, 199(1):269-271.
  • 5Chelfouh N, Grenier N, Higueret D, et al. Characteriza- tion of urinary calculi: in vitro study of "Twinkling arti- fact" revealed by color-flow sonography [ J ]. AJR, 1998, 171 (4) :1055-1060.
  • 6Ulusan S, Koc Z, Tokmak N. Accuracy of sonography for detecting renal stone: Comparison with CT [ J ]. J Clin Ultrasound, 2007, 35 (5) :256-261.
  • 7Winkel R R, Kalhauge A, Fredfeldt K E. The usefulness of ultrasound colour-doppler twinkling artefact for detec- ting urolithiasis compared with low dose nonenhanced computerized tomography [ J ]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2012, 38(7) :1180-1187.
  • 8Tsao T F, Tyan Y S, Kang R J, et al. Correlation study of the strength of the color Doppler twinkling artifact with the roughness of the reflecting surface and the Doppler angles [J]. J Med Ultrasound, 2004, 12 (4) : 119-124.
  • 9Turrin A, Minola P, Costa F, et al. Diagnostic value of colour Doppler twinkling artefact in sites negative for stones on B mode renal sonography [ J]. Urological Re- search, 2007, 35(6):313-317.
  • 10Moesbergen T C, de Ryke R J. Dunbar S, et al. Distal ureteral calculi : US follow-up [ J ]. Radiology, 2011, 260(2) :575-580.

共引文献23

同被引文献16

引证文献3

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部