二律背反视域下量刑规范化研究

Standardization of sentencing under antinomy sight

由二律背反思维出发,考量精确制导型量刑规范化、刑之裁量型量刑规范化与相对精确型量刑规范化的各自模式以及逻辑误区。厘定基准刑与法定刑的等同关系,揭示基准刑思维的理论困境。坚持责任刑制约下的预防刑裁量原则既是合理量刑,也是公正量刑的可行路径。必须引导控辩审三方积极参加独立的量刑程序,应当增加量刑说理制度并记载于刑事判决文书中,使得法官可以有法理上与制度上的支撑来面对量刑不公的质疑。

Starting to think from the antinomy,precision-guided type of standardized sentencing considerations, criminal sentencing discretion of standardization and type the exact opposite of each type of standardized sentencing patterns and logic errors. Determining the relationship between the reference equivalent penalty and punishment to reveal the theoretical dilemma baseline sentence thinking. Upholding the criminal liability constraints prevent criminal sentencing discretion principle is both reasonable and feasible path is fair sentencing. Must guide the judge, prosecution and sentencing to participate actively in a separate program, it should increase the sentencing system and reasoning described in criminal sentences instruments, so that the judge may have the institutional support to face the challenge of unfair sentencing jurisprudence.