期刊文献+

再保险精算模型风险评估——基于相依关系的实证研究

Risk Evaluation of A Reinsurance Actuarial Model——An Empirical Research on Dependence Relationship
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文利用极值copula描述承保业务损失之间的相依关系并以此构建再保险精算风险模型。考虑在不同门限值下如何确定两类极端事件的重现期以及在不同免赔额和责任限额下如何厘定超额赔付再保险的保费和线率。重现期、再保险保费和线率这三类风险度量指标都与边际分布和极值copula相关。实证研究表明,风险评估的效果受到相依关系的影响,而传统的独立性假设会导致重现期、再保险保费和线率出现不同程度偏差。 This paper applied the extreme-value copula to describe the dependence structure between underwriting losses, and constructed the reinsurance actuarial model on this basis. The return periods with different thresholds for two extreme events were given. Then the reinsurance premium and bivariate rate on line for excess of loss reinsurance were determined under different deductibles and liability caps. The marginal distributions and the extreme-value copula were both related to the return period, reinsurance premium and rate on line. The empirical results illustrate the impacts of the fitted dependence structure on these risk measures, and the traditional independence assumption may lead to different levels of deviation of the return period, reinsurance premium and the rate on line.
作者 胡祥 段白鸽 孙维伟 HU Xiang DUAN Baige SUN Weiwei(School of Finance, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Hubei Wuhan 430073 School of Economics, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433 School of Management, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin 300384)
出处 《保险研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第6期103-113,共11页 Insurance Studies
基金 国家自然科学基金青年项目(71601186 71401041 71603180) 教育部人文社科基金青年项目(14YJCZH025)的资助
关键词 极值copula 重现期 再保险保费 线率 extreme-value copula return period reinsurance premium rate on line
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献69

  • 1余素红,张世英,宋军.基于GARCH模型和SV模型的VaR比较[J].管理科学学报,2004,7(5):61-66. 被引量:76
  • 2Ouyang Zisheng,Xie Chi.GENERALIZED PARETO DISTRIBUTION FIT TO MEDICAL INSURANCE CLAIMS DATA[J].Applied Mathematics(A Journal of Chinese Universities),2006,21(1):21-29. 被引量:2
  • 3吴振翔,陈敏,叶五一,缪柏其.基于Copula-GARCH的投资组合风险分析[J].系统工程理论与实践,2006,26(3):45-52. 被引量:85
  • 4Bouye, E., Roncalli, T. Applications. Econometrics Durrleman, V. (2000). Copulas Londres : City Research Centre. Nikeghbali, A., Riboulet, G. and for Finance, A Reading Guide and Some University Business School-Financial Working Paper.
  • 5Bouye, E. (2001). Muhivariate Extremes at Work for Portfolio Risk Measurement. FERC working paper, WP01 - 10, September.
  • 6Bradley, B.O. and Taqqu, M.S. (2003). Financial Risk and Heavy Tails. In: Rachev, S.T. (Ed.), Handbook of Heavy-Tailed Distributions in Finance. Elsevier, Rotterdam, pp. 35- 103.
  • 7Cossette, H. and P. Gaillardetz. (2002). On Two Dependent Individual Risk Models. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 30:153 - 166.
  • 8Demarta, S. and McNeil, A.J. (2005). The t Copula and Related Cooulas. International Statistical Review 73, 111 - 130.
  • 9Embrechts, P., A. McNeil and D. Straumann. (2002). Correlation and Dependence in Risk Management: Properties and Pitfalls, in: M. Dempster (Ed.), Risk Management: Value-at-Risk and Beyond, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 176 - 223.
  • 10Frees, E. W. and Valdez, E. (1998). Understanding Relationships Using Copulas. North American Actuarial Journal, 2(1), 1 -25.

共引文献63

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部