多种微创方法联合个体化治疗重症急性胰腺炎

Multiple Minimally Invasive Methods and Individual Treatment of Severe Acute Pancreatitis

目的探究重症急性胰腺炎患者通过多种微创方法联合个体化治疗后取得的临床成效。方法随机选取该院收治的重症急性胰腺炎患者80例,且均在2014年1月—2016年6月入院,依随机分组标准分为观察组(40例)和对照组(40例)。对照组和观察组患者治疗方法分别为常规治疗、多种微创方法联合个体化治疗。从治疗有效率及生存质量状况两方面入手,针对相关内容进行分析。结果对照组治疗总有效率(77.5%)比观察组(92.5%)低(P<0.05);在生存质量方面,观察组患者各项指标,包括身体健康、心理健康、社会关系及环境因素方面的得分分别为(86.1±10.2)分、(80.1±9.2)分、(87.3±9.7)分、(88.5±11.3)分,对照组患者各指标得分分别为(63.2±9.7)分、(52.3±12.6)分、(70.8±10.1)分、(73.5±11.4)分,对照组得分均明显低于观察组(P<0.05)。结论重症急性胰腺炎患者通过多种微创方法联合个体化治疗后,在提高治疗效果的同时,使生存质量显著改善,存在一定推广价值。

Objective To study the clinical curative effect of multiple minimally invasive methods and individual treatment of severe acute pancreatitis. Methods 80 cases of patients with severe acute pancreatitis admitted and treated in our hospital from January 2014 to June 2016 were randomly selected and randomly divided into two groups with 40 cases in each,the control group and the observation group were respectively treated with routine treatment, multiple minimally invasive methods and individual treatment, and the related contents were analyzed from the treatment effective rate and survival quality. Results The total treatment effective rate in the control group was lower than that in the observation group（77.5% vs92.5%）（P〈0.05）, and various indexes such as physical health, mental health, social relationship and environmental factor in the observation group were obviously higher than those in the control group[（86.1 ±10.2）points,（80.1±9.2）points,（87.3±9.7）points,（88.5±11.3）points vs（63.2±9.7）points,（52.3±12.6）points,（70.8±10.1）points,（73.5±11.4）points],（P〈0.05）. Conclusion Multiple minimally invasive methods and individual treatment of severe acute pancreatitis can improve the treatment effect and obviously improve the survival quality, which is of a certain promotion value.