期刊文献+

红细胞容积分布宽度与肾移植术后ARDS患者病死率的相关性分析 被引量:3

Correlation analysis between red cell volume distribution width and the mortality rate in ARDS patients after renal transplantation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨红细胞容积分布宽度(RDW)与肾移植术后急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者病死率的相关性。方法回顾性分析106例肾移植术后ARDS患者的临床资料,根据RDW的高低分为RDW正常组(≤15.0%,68例)和RDW升高组(>15.0%,38例)。比较两组患者的基本情况和不良事件发生情况,绘制Kaplan-Meier曲线比较两组的50 d病死率,采用Cox比例风险回归分析ARDS患者死亡的风险因素。结果 106例患者中,50 d内死亡总例数为46例(43.4%)。两组在序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分、血清肌酐、血红蛋白及血小板计数的差异有统计学意义(均为P<0.05)。RDW升高组患者的50 d病死率及感染性休克发生率明显高于RDW正常组,差异均有统计学意义(均为P<0.05),Kaplan-Meier生存曲线分析表明,RDW升高组与正常组患者的50 d病死率差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。Cox比例风险回归法单因素分析发现,血红蛋白<100 g/L、血清肌酐>133μmol/L、血小板计数<100×109/L、重度ARDS、RDW>15.0%均为ARDS患者50 d内死亡的潜在危险因素(均为P<0.05)。多因素分析发现,重度ARDS[比值比(OR)=12.77,95%可信区间(CI)11.63~15.39,P<0.001]和RDW>15.0%(OR=2.01,95%CI 1.02~3.94,P<0.043)为ARDS患者50 d内死亡的独立危险因素。结论 RDW升高与肾移植术后ARDS患者疾病严重程度和50 d病死率相关,可以作为一项较有意义的预测肾移植术后ARDS患者预后的临床指标。 Objective To investigate the correlation between red cell volume distribution width(RDW) and the mortality rate of acute respiratory distress syndrome(ARDS) patients after renal transplantation. Methods Clinical data of 106 ARDS patients undergoing renal transplantation were retrospectively analyzed. According to RDW, all patients were assigned into the normal(≤15.0%, n=68) and increasing RDW groups(15.0%, n=38). Baseline data and the incidence of adverse events were statistically compared between two groups. Kaplan-Meier survival curve was adopted to compare the 50 d-mortality rate between two groups. Cox's proportional hazards regression model was utilized to identify the risk factors of the mortality of ARDS patients. Results Among 106 patients, the 50 d-mortality rate was calculated as 43.4%(46/106). The sequential organ failure assessment(SOFA) score, serum creatinine, hemoglobin and platelet count significantly differed between two groups(all P〈0.05). In the increasing RDW group, the 50 d-mortality rate and the incidence of infectious shock were significantly higher than those in the normal RDW group(both P〈0.05). KaplanMeier survival curve demonstrated that the 50 d-mortality rate significantly differed between two groups(P〈0.01). Cox's proportional hazards regression model univariate analysis revealed that hemoglobin level100 g/L, serum creatinine 133 μmol/L, platelet count100×109/L, severe ARDS and RDW15.0% were the potential risk factors of the 50 d-mortality rate in ARDS patients(all P〈0.05). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that severe ARDS [odd ratio(OR)=12.77, 95% confidence interval(CI) 11.63-15.39, P0.001] and RDW15.0%(OR=2.01, 95%CI 1.02-3.94, P0.043) were the independent risk factors of the 50 d-mortality rate in ARDS patients. Conclusions RDW elevation is correlated with the severity of disease and 50 d-mortality rate in ARDS patients following renal transplantation. RDW can serve as a clinical parameter to predict the prognosis of ARDS patients after renal transplantation.
作者 阳敏 刘洪 佘兴国 牛英 万齐全 庄权 彭博 朱毅 李偲 明英姿 Yang Min Liu Hong She Xingguo Niu Hng Wan Qiquan Zhuang Quan Peng Bo Zhu Yi Li Cai Ming Yngzi.(Transplantation Center of the Third Xiangya Hospital Central South University, Changsha 410013, China)
出处 《器官移植》 CAS CSCD 2017年第4期276-281,共6页 Organ Transplantation
基金 吴阶平医学基金会临床科研专项资助基金(320.6750.15070) 湖南省自然科学基金平衡项目(2016JJ4105)
关键词 红细胞容积分布宽度(RDW) 急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS) 肾移植 肺部感染 预后 预测因素 公民逝世后器官捐献 脓毒血症 Red cell volume distribution width(RDW) Acute respiratory distress syndrome(ARDS) Renal transplantation Pulmonary infection Prognosis Predictor Organ donation after citizen's death Septicopyemia
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献27

  • 1Halloran PF~ Hunsicker LG. Delayed graft function: state of the art, November 10-11, 2000. Summit meeting, Scottsdale, Arizona, USAIJI.AmJ Transplant, 2001, 1(2): 115-120.
  • 2Ojo AO, Wolfe RA, Held PJ, et al. Delayed graft function: risk factors and implications for renal allografi survival [J]. Transplantation, 1997, 63(7): 968-974.
  • 3Q uiroga I, McShane P, Koo DDH, et al. Major effects of delayed graft function and cold ischaemia time on renal allograft survival[J]. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2006, 21 (6): 1689-1696.
  • 4Hern,'indez D, Rufino M, Armas S, et al. Retrospective analysis of surgical complications following cadaveric kidney transplantation in the modem transplant era[J]. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2006, 21(10): 2908-2915.
  • 5Sanchez-Fructuoso A, Sanchez DP, Vidas MM, et al. Nonheart beating donors[J]. Nephrol Dialysis Transplantation, 2004, 19(3): 26-31.
  • 6Johnston O, O'Kelly P, Spencer S, et al. Reduced graft function (with or without dialysis) vs immediate graft function-a comparison of long- term renal allograft survival[J]. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2006, 21(8): 2270-2274.
  • 7Perico N, Cattaneo D, Sayegh MH, et al. Delayed graft function in kidney transplantation[J]. Lancet, 2004, 364(9447): 1814-1827.
  • 8Locke JE, Segev DL, Warren DS, et aL Outcomes of kidneys from donors after cardiac death: implications for allocation and preservation[J]. AmJ Transplant, 2007, 7(7): 1797-1807.
  • 9Chapman J, Bock A, Dussol B, et al. Follow-up after renal transplantation with organs from donors after cardiac death[J]. Transpl hat, 2006, 19(9): 715-719.
  • 10Rengel M, Kanter J, Puerta M, et al. Kidney transplantation with grafts from non-heart-beating donors[J]. Transplant Proc, 2006, 38(3): 890-891.

共引文献7

同被引文献18

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部