期刊文献+

企业环境违规与企业价值研究——以我国化工行业A股上市公司为例 被引量:9

The Relationship between Corporate Environmental Violation and Corporate Value——Taking A Chinese A-share Listed Companies in the Chemical Industry as An Example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以往对企业环境表现与经济表现关系的研究,因研究方法差异未产生一致的结论。研究以2009—2015年在沪深两市上市交易的化学原料和化学制品制造业A股企业为样本,分析企业市场价值对企业环境违规的反应,以及这种反应的调节因素。结果表明:企业环境违规与企业价值呈负相关;环境违规信息的公开质量具有调节企业环境违规与企业价值之间相关性的作用,经信息公开质量修正的企业环境违规与企业价值之间的负相关性更为显著;2012—2015年间企业环境违规数量的增加(降低)是企业价值降低(提高)的格兰杰原因。 The findings of prior empirical research were inconsistent on the relationship between corporate environmental performance and corporate economic performance due to different research methods. This study examines the relationship between corporate environmental violations and corporate market values and its moderator. The samples of the study are the chemical enterprises that listed in Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges in 2009-2015. The study reveals that corporate environmental violations are negatively related?to corporate values and the changes to corporate environmental violations resulted in opposite changes to corporate market values. The increase (decrease) of the number of corporate environmental violations is the Granger cause of the decrease (increase) of corporate values. Moreover, this relationship is moderated by the quality of environmental violation information public disclosure. The theoretical contributions and practical implications of the study are also discussed.
作者 徐华 赵晓康 XU Hua ZHAO Xiao-kang(The Glorious Sun School of Business and Management, Donghua University, Shanghai 200051, China)
出处 《南通大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第4期142-148,共7页 Journal of Nantong University:Social Sciences Edition
关键词 环境表现 经济表现 企业环境违规 企业价值 environmental performance economic performance corporate environmental violation corporate value
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献17

  • 1汤亚莉,陈自力,刘星,李文红.我国上市公司环境信息披露状况及影响因素的实证研究[J].管理世界,2006,22(1):158-159. 被引量:242
  • 2马克斯·韦伯著,林荣远译.1997.经济与社会.北京:商务印书馆.
  • 3Aerts W, Cormier D. 2009. Media Legitimacy and Corporate Environmental Communication. Accounting, Organizations and So- ciety, 34:1 - 27.
  • 4Beyer A, Cohen D A, Lys T Z, Walther B R. 2009. The Financial Reporting Environment: Review of the Recent Literature. Conference Paper, JAE Conference at the MIT Sloan School of Management.
  • 5Clarkson P, Li Y, Richardson G, Vasvari F P. 2008. Revisiting the Relation between Environmental Performance and Environ- mental Disclosure : An Empirical Analysis. Accounting, Organizations, and Society, 33 : 303- 327.
  • 6Deephouse D L. 1996. Does isomorphism legitimate? Academy of Management Journal, 39:1024 -1039.
  • 7Healy P M, Palepu K G. 2001. Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31 : 405 -440.
  • 8Heflin F, Subramanyam K R, Zhang Y. 2003. Regulation FD and the Financial Information Environment: Early Evidence. The Accounting Review, 1 : 1 - 37.
  • 9Janis I L, Fadner R. 1965. The coefficient of imbalance in Lasswe11 H, Leites N. and associates ( Eds. ), Language of politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 153- 169.
  • 10Kothari S P, Shu S, Wysocki, P D. 2009. Do Managers Withhold Bad News. Journal of Accounting Research, 1 : 241 - 276.

共引文献474

同被引文献121

二级引证文献86

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部