期刊文献+

基于HLA组特异性单倍体全长测序方法对模棱两可结果的准确定型 被引量:1

Accurate determination of HLA ambiguous results based on group-specific haploid full-length sequencing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 背景:传统的HLA测序分型技术都是对父系母系双倍体进行扩增,由于HLA多样性高,产生了大量的模棱两可难题,而采用基于组特异性单倍体全长测序分型方法来解决模棱两可结果的确认定型鲜有报道。目的:分析基于组特异性单倍体全长测序分型方法对HLA基因分型模棱两可结果准确定型的效果。方法:对2例模棱两可结果标本以低分辨率分型方法结果作为参考起点,通过组特异性扩增分离,基于等位基因全长单倍体的Sanger测序(PCR-SBT)分型。结果与结论:(1)2例模棱两可分型结果分别为A*02∶03∶01及C*07:02∶01∶01杂合新等位基因;(2)A*02∶03∶01杂合新等位基因与A*11∶01∶01∶01全长比较,在NT817由C发生突变为T;(3)C*07∶02∶01∶01杂合新等位基因与C*08∶01∶01比较,在NT879由A发生突变为G;(4)结果表明,以低分辨率分型方法结果作为参考起点,通过组特异性扩增分离,基于组特异性单倍体全长测序分型方法能准确定型HLA基因分型模棱两可结果并发现新等位基因。 BACKGROUND: Due to the polymorphism of HLA, a large number of ambiguities have been generated by conventional HLA typing techniques, and confirmed stereotypes of ambiguous results based on group-specific haploid full-length typing are rarely reported. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the accuracy of HLA-typing ambigulity based on group-specific haploid full-length sequencing. METHODS: The low-resolution results were used as the starting point for two ambiguous samples. Sanger sequencing(PCR-SBT) based on haploid full-length was performed after group-specific amplification. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: One case showed a new A*02:03:01 allele, which was found a mutation in NT817 from C to T in comparison with A*11:01:01:01. The other case indicated another new C*07:02:01:01, which was found a mutation in NT879 from A to G in comparison with C*08:01:01. In conclusion, these results indicate that the group-specific haploid full-length sequencing method can be used to accurately classify HLA alleles and to discover new alleles.
出处 《中国组织工程研究》 CAS 北大核心 2017年第20期3208-3215,共8页 Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
基金 广东省医学科研基金(A2016222) 深圳市战略新兴产业发展专项资金(JSGG20160328103642937) 深圳市科技研发资金(JCYJ20160427172335974) 深圳市卫生计生系统科研项目(201401077)~~
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献10

  • 1KawaseT, Morishima Y, Matsuo K. et al. High-risk HLAallele mismatch combinations responsible for severe acute grafl-versuvs-host disease and implication for its molecular mechanism[J]. Blood, 2007, 110(7)=2235-2241.
  • 2Flomenberg N, Haxtcr-I vowe LA, Confer I〕,el al. Impact ofHLA class I and class II high-resolution matching on outcomesof unrelated donor bone marrow iranspianlation : HLA-Cmismatching is associated with a strong adverse effect ontransplantation outcome[J]. Blood, 2004 , 104(7) : 1923-1930.
  • 3Petersdorf EW, Anasetti C,Martin PJ,et al. Limits of HLAmismatching in unrelated hematopoietic cell transplantation [J ],Blood, 2004, 104(9):2976-2980.
  • 4Voorter CE, Mulkers E, Liebelt P, et al. Reanalysis ofsequence-based HLA-A,~B and -Cw typings: how ambiguous istoday's SBT typing tomorrow [J], Tissue Antigens. 2007, 70(5):383-389.
  • 5Cano P,Klilz W, Mack SJ,et al. Common and weIl~documentedHLA alleles: report of the Ad-Hoc committee of the americansociety for histocompatiblity and immunogcnetics [J]. HumImmunol, 2007,68(5) :392-417.
  • 6Deng Z, Wang D, Xu Y, et al. HLA-C polymorphisms and PCRdropout in exons 2 and 3 of the Cw * 0706 allele in sequence-based typing for unrelated Chinese marrow donors Ci 3- HumImmunol, 2010, 71 (6) :577-581.
  • 7Adams SD,Barracchini KC,Chen I),et al. Ambiguous allelecombinations in HLA Class 1 and Class U sequencc-basedtyping : when precise nucleotide sequencing leads to impreciseallele identification[J]. J Transl Med, 2004, 2(1):30.
  • 8HeJ, Li Y, Bao X,et al. Common and well-documented(CWD) alleles of human leukocyte antigen-A, -B, -C, -DRB1,and -DQB1 loci for the Chinese Han population do not quitecorrelate with the ASHI CWD atleles[j]. Hum Immunol, 2012 ,73C1) :61-66.
  • 9邹红岩,程良红,金士正,李桢,王巍,蒋妍.中国南方汉族人群HLA-A,B,DRB1基因测序分型模棱两可结果的分布及其解决方案[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2008,12(B12):10481-10486. 被引量:1
  • 10高素青,徐筠娉,王大明,金士正,邹红岩,邓志辉.HLA-Cw基因常规检测区外第1、5、6、7外显子核苷酸序列测定的研究及临床应用[J].中华检验医学杂志,2010,33(6):513-516. 被引量:5

共引文献6

同被引文献11

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部