摘要
柏拉图的《伊安篇》一直被学界视为其灵感论的经典文本,然而仔细梳理其论述逻辑之后发现,文本中对灵感的论述有极大的理论缺陷,远不及其对Tekhnē问题的关注。通过对《伊安篇》各版本中Tekhnē含义的考察,发现Tekhnē具有十分重要的学术价值,可惜长期被灵感论所遮蔽。柏拉图的Tekhnē并不是我们所说的"技艺",而是基于知识的"技术"。柏拉图在《伊安篇》中建构的其实不是灵感论,而是技术诗学。
While Ion is regarded as a classic text of Plato＇s Inspirationism, apparent theoretical defects exist after we analyze its expounding logic, since the discussion on Inspirationism is relatively less than the attention paid to the issue of ＂Tekhne＂ Investigations into the meaning of ＂Tekhne＂ in various versions of Ion reveal its prominent academic value which has been veiled by Inspirationism for a long time. Plato＇s ＂Tekhne＂ refers to ＂technology＂ based on knowledge, but not ＂technique.＂ What Plato constructs in Ion is not Inspirationism, but technological poetics.
作者
陈海
Chen Hai(Associate Professor, Faculty of Liberal Arts, Northwest University, Xi＇an, Shaanxi Province, China)
出处
《外国文学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第4期96-103,共8页
Foreign Literature
基金
陕西省社科界重大理论与现实问题研究项目"陕西网络文学产业发展策略研究"(2017Z038)
中国文艺评论(西北大学)基地阶段性成果
