摘要
目的探讨迁移因素、父母教养方式与认知情绪调节策略对生态移民儿童冲动行为的影响,为促进生态移民儿童心理健康提供参考。方法采用Barratt冲动量表(Barratt Impulsiveness Scale,BIS-Ⅱ)、家庭教养方式问卷(Parental Bonding Instrument,PBI)和认知情绪调节问卷(Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire,CERQ)对宁夏生态移民地区的生态移民儿童及原居地儿童进行问卷调查,通过多层线性回归分析了解迁移分组、家庭教养方式与认知情绪调节策略对生态移民儿童冲动行为的影响。结果共包括700名生态移民儿童和700名原居地儿童,其中生态移民儿童冲动行为总分(66.89±10.40)高于原居地儿童(65.31±11.64)(t=2.74,P<0.05)。回归分析显示,迁移分组因素(β=-0.13)、家庭教养方式中的父亲控制(β=0.26)和母亲关爱(β=-0.17)、认知情绪调节的接受维度(β=-0.12)和自我责难维度(β=0.19)对冲动行为均有影响(P值均<0.05)。结论生态移民儿童的冲动行为总分高于原居地儿童,积极的认知情绪调节策略和父母关爱的家庭教养方式均有助于减少生态移民儿童冲动行为的发生。
Objective To explore the relationship between migration, parenting practice and cognitive emotion regulation with impulsive behaviors among eco-migrant children. Methods Barratt Impulsiveness Scale( BIS-II), Parental Bonding Instrument( PBI) and Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire( CERQ) was implemented among eco-migrant children and indigenous children. The multiple regression analysis was used in statistical analysis migration,parenting practice and cognitive emotion regulation with impulsive behaviors among eco-migrant children. Results A total of 700 indigenous children and 700 eco-migrant children. The score of impulsive behavior in eco-migrant children( 66.89±10.40) was higher than indigenous children( 65.31±11.64)( t= 2.74, P〈0.05). The influence factors of impulsive behavior included( β =-0.13), father control( β = 0.26) and mother care( β =-0.17) of parenting style, acceptance( β =-0.12) and self-criticism( β = 0.19) of cognitive emotion regulation( P〈0.05). Conclusion The score of impulsive behavior in eco-migrant children is higher than indigenous children.Adaptive cognitive emotion regulation strategies and positive parenting practice could help to reduce impulsive behavior among eco-migrant children.
出处
《中国学校卫生》
CAS
北大核心
2017年第7期1015-1017,共3页
Chinese Journal of School Health
关键词
家庭
认知
情绪
冲动行为
移民
儿童
Family
Cognition
Emotions
Impulsive behavior
Emigrants and immigrants
Child