期刊文献+

ROMA指数在妇科盆腔肿瘤高危人群风险评估的意义 被引量:1

Significance of ROMA index in risk assessment of high risk population of gynecological pelvic tumors
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 运用卵巢恶性肿瘤风险模型(ROMA指数)对盆腔肿瘤恶性风险进行评估.方法 采用电化学发光法免疫测定68例卵巢癌、54例子宫癌,242例卵巢良性病变、128例子宫肌腺瘤以及56例健康女性的血清HE4和CA125含量,计算患者ROMA值.结果 卵巢癌患者、子宫癌患者、卵巢良性病变、子宫良性肌腺瘤、健康体检女性血清HE4与 CA125含量分别为(291.8±63.26)与(463.2±288.2)、(175.6±45.5)与(513.7±138.5)、(34.6±16.2)与(61.5±9.6)、(32.4±10.7)与(82.6±29.7)、(31.9±11.7)pmol/L与(16.3±8.9)U/L.ROMA指数阳性灵敏度和特异性分别为89.71和96.48.结论 联合检测血清HE4和CA125比单一检测提高阳性检出率,ROMA指数在高风险患者的评估更直观,特异性更强,有利于高危人群的早期筛查和盆腔肿物的良恶鉴别. Objective To evaluate the risk of malignant pelvic tumors by using the ovarian malignant tumor risk model(ROMA index).Methods The serum levels of HE4 and CA125 in 68 cases of ovarian cancer,54 cases of uterine cancer,242 cases of benign ovarian lesions,128 cases of uterine muscle adenoma and 56 cases of healthy women were measured by electrochemical luminescence immunoassay.Results The patients with ovarian cancer,uterine cancer,ovarian benign lesions,benign uterine adenomyosis,healthy women serum HE4 and CA125 content were 291.8±63.26 and 463.2±288.2,175.6±45.5 and 513.7±138.5,34.6±16.2 and 61.5±9.6,32.4±10.7 and 82.6±29.7,31.9±11.7 pmol/l with 16.3±8.9 U/L.The positive sensitivity and specificity of ROMA were 89.71 and 96.48,respectively.Conclusion The combined detection of serum HE4 and CA125 increase the positive rate than single detection.The ROMA index in the evaluation of high risk patients more intuitive,more specific,early screening and differential diagnosis of benign and malignant pelvic tumors to the high-risk population.
作者 王晓东 王然 李凤焕 向鑫 WANG Xiao-dong WANG Ran LI Feng-huan XIANG Xin(Department of Laboratory ,No. 254 Hospital of PLA , Tianjin 300142,China)
出处 《检验医学与临床》 CAS 2017年第A01期94-96,共3页 Laboratory Medicine and Clinic
关键词 卵巢恶性肿瘤风险模型 人附睾分泌蛋白4 糖类抗原125 卵巢癌 子宫内膜癌 ROMA index HE4 CA125 ovarian cancer endometrial cancer
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献57

  • 1李巍,崔恒,冯捷,李艺.卵巢癌诊断的研究进展[J].中华妇产科杂志,2005,40(7):496-498. 被引量:74
  • 2连利娟,林巧稚.妇科肿瘤学[M].第4版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2006:604.
  • 3Jacobs I J, Menon U. Progress and challenges in screening for early detection of ovarian cancer. Mol Cell Proteomics, 2004, 3 : 355- 366.
  • 4Bast RC Jr, Brewer M, Zou C, et al. Prevention and early detection of ovarian cancer: mission impossible? Recent Results Cancer Res, 2007, 174:91-100.
  • 5Morgan RJ Jr, Alvarez RD, Armstrong DK, et al. Ovarian cancer. Clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2006, 4:912-939.
  • 6Rustin GJ, Bast RC Jr, Kelloff GJ, et al. Use of CA-125 in clinical trial evaluation of new therapeutic drugs for ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res, 2004, 10:3919-3926.
  • 7Hellstrom I, Raycraft J, Hayden-Ledbetter, et al. The HE4 (WFIXE) protein is a biomarker for ovarian carcinoma. Cancer Res, 2003, 63 : 3695 -3700.
  • 8Havrilesky LJ, Whitehead CM, Rubatt JM, et al. Evaluation of biomarker panels for early stage ovarian cancer detection and monitoring for disease recurrence. Gynecol Oncol, 2008, 110 : 374-382.
  • 9Moore RG, Brown AK, Miller MC, et al. The use of multiple novel tumor biomarkers for the detection of ovarian carcinoma in patients with a pelvic mass. Gynecol Oncol, 2008, 108:402-408.
  • 10Moore RG, McMeekin DS, Brown AK, et al. A novel multiple marker bioassay utilizing HE4 and CA125 for the prediction of ovarian cancer in patients with a pelvic mass. Gynecol Oncol, 2009, 112: 40-46.

共引文献109

同被引文献10

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部