期刊文献+

从法益保护角度区界股权型众筹与非法集资 被引量:1

Differentation of Equity-Based Crowed-Funding and Illegal Fund-Raisiuy from the Perspective of Legal Interests Protection
下载PDF
导出
摘要 我国股权型众筹包括互联网非公开股权融资和股权众筹两种模式,目前非法集资所涉罪名中大致可分为诈骗型和非诈骗型集资犯罪两种类型。诈骗型非法集资犯罪的法益重在保护投资者利益,避免投资者因陷入错误状态而遭受财产损失,而非诈骗型非法集资犯罪则侧重打击违规行为,其中非法吸收公众存款罪的侧重点应在于资金用途的考量,即银行存款业务,而擅自设立金融机构或者擅自发行股票等准入型犯罪的认定重点则在于公开发行的认定。 Equity-based crowd-funding in China includes two models: internet private equity financing and equity crowd-funding. At present, the crimes of illegal fund-raising can be roughly divided into fraudulent and non-fraudulent illegal fund-raising crimes. The legal interest of fraudulent illegal fund-raising crime is to protect the interests of investors, avoiding the loss of property due to the wrong state of investors, while non-fraudulent illegal fund-raising crime focuses on fighting against the irregularities. The determination of illegal absorption of public deposits should take capital use, that is, bank deposits business, into considerations. And the determination of other entry-type crimes, like unauthorized establishment of financial institutions and unauthorized issuance of stocks, should focus on the identification of public offering.
作者 彭莎 PENG Sha(Law School, Tianjin University of Commerce, Tianjin 300134, China)
出处 《中北大学学报(社会科学版)》 2017年第4期12-16,23,共6页 Journal of North University of China:Social Science Edition
关键词 股权众筹 互联网非公开股权融资 非法集资 equity crowd-funding internet private equity financing illegal fund-raising
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献26

  • 1冯亚东,刘凤科.非法吸收公众存款罪的本质及立法失误[J].人民检察,2001(7):19-21. 被引量:28
  • 2赵秉志 万云峰.非法吸收公众存款罪探讨.人民司法,2004,(2).
  • 3周宏伟.《“口口相传”也是非法集资重要宣传途径》,《检察日报》2011年3月28日,第3版.
  • 4J. D. Cox,R. W. Hillman & D. C. Langevoot, Securities Regulation Cases and Materials, New York: Aspen Publishers, 2006.
  • 5陈鸣.《证券非公开发行判断标准之比较研究-从<证券法>第十条谈起》,http://vip.chinalawinfo.corn/newlaw2002/slc/SLC.asp?Db=artg&Gid=335582819,2011年5月29日.
  • 6United States Securities and Exchange Commission, "Implications of the Growth of Hedge Funds,"http:// www. sec. gov/news/studies/hedgefunds0903, pdf,2011 - 05 - 29.
  • 7R. Garrett,"The Private Offering Exemption," in R. Mundheim, A. Fleischer & J. Schupper(eds. ), Fourth Annual Institute on Securities Regulation ,New York: Practising Law Institute,1973, pp. 10- 11.
  • 8Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ralston Purina Co. , 346 U. S. 119, 73 S. Ct. 981(1953).
  • 9Rule 501(a) of SEC Regulation D.
  • 10Rule 146(c) of SEC Regulation D.

共引文献195

同被引文献4

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部