期刊文献+

大学生网络亲密关系量表的初步编制 被引量:3

Development the online intimate relationship questionnaire for college students
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的编制适用于大学生的网络亲密关系量表并检验其信效度。方法以大学生为被试,通过6次抽样,共调查1105人次。在参考已有文献、开放式问卷调查结果以及半结构化访谈和专家意见的基础上,通过项目分析、探索性因素分析以及信效度分析,最终编制出了大学生网络亲密关系量表。结果大学生网络亲密关系量表是由亲密、激情和承诺三个一阶因素组成的二阶单因素模型,验证性因素分析表明模型拟合良好(x^2/df=3.47,GFI=0.92,NFI=0.90,CFI=0.92,TLI=0.90,WI=0.92,RMSEA=0.08);量表及其各维度的Cronbach’s α系数在0.73~0.89之间,重测信度在0.80—0.91之间,同时该量表具有较好的外部效度和聚敛效度。结论大学生网络亲密关系量表具有较好的信效度.可以用于测量大学生的网络亲密关系。 Objective To develop the scale to measure online intimate relationship and test its va- lidity and reliability for college students. Methods A total of 1 105 subjects were recruited in this investiga- tion for 6 times. Based on literatures, open-ended questionnaire investigations, semi-structured interview and experts' opinions, item analyses, exploratory factor analyses, validity and reliability analysis were conducted to develop the scale.Results The self-made scale showed a second-order structure,including intimacy,pas- sion and commitment dimension. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the model had good fit (XZ/df= 3.47, GFI--- 0.92, NFI = 0.90, CFI = 0.92,TLI = 0.90, IFI = 0.92, RMSEA = 0.08 ).The 3 dimensions had good internal reliability with Cronbach' s α coefficients from 0.73 to 0.89 and retest reliability coefficients from 0.80 to 0.91.1n addition,the scale had good external validity and convergent validity.Conclusion The self- made scale has acceptable reliabilities and validities,which can be used to measure online intimate relation- ship for college students.
出处 《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2017年第7期656-660,共5页 Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
关键词 大学生 网络亲密关系 信度 效度 College students Online intimate relationship Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献101

  • 1李虹,陈启芳.Kansas婚姻满意感量表的北京和香港常模[J].心理发展与教育,2002,18(4):82-85. 被引量:8
  • 2郝雁丽.“网络性行为”对大学生性道德的负面影响及干预策略[J].理论导刊,2007(5):70-72. 被引量:6
  • 3Anderson, T. L. (2005). Relationships among interact attitudes, intemet use, romantic beliefs, and perceptions of online romantic relationships. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 8, 521-531.
  • 4Ando, R., & Sakamoto, A. (in press). The effect of cyber-friends on loneliness and social anxiety: differences between high and low self-evaluated physical attractiveness groups. Computers in Human Behavior.
  • 5Arvidsson, A. (2006). 'Quality singles': internet dating and the work of fantasy. New Media Society, 8, 671-690.
  • 6Ben-Ze'ev, A. (2003). Privacy, emotional closeness, and openness in cyberspace. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 451-467.
  • 7Ben-Ze'ev, A. (2004a). Flirting on and offline. Convergence." The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 10, 24-42.
  • 8Ben-Ze'ev, A. (2004b). Love Online: Emotions on the Internet. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • 9Brunet, P. M., & Schmidt, L. A. (2007). Is shyness context specific? Relation between shyness and online self-disclosure with and without a live webcam in young adults. Journal of Research in Personality, 41,938-945.
  • 10Chou, C., & Peng, H. (2007). Net-friends: adolescents' attitudes and experiences vs. teachers' concerns. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2394-2413.

共引文献30

同被引文献27

引证文献3

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部