期刊文献+

书面反馈对一般过去时规则形式显性与隐性知识学习的作用 被引量:5

Effectiveness of Written Corrective Feedback on the Explicit and Implicit Knowledge of English Regular Past Tense
原文传递
导出
摘要 本研究考察三种不同形式的书面反馈对英语一般过去时规则形式显性和隐性知识学习的作用。研究采用"前测-后测-延时后测"的实验设计,将74位中国的英语学习者分为间接反馈组、直接反馈组、元语反馈组和控制组,并分别用看图写话和限时语法测试检验显性、隐性知识学习的情况。结果显示:三种书面反馈均能促进目标结构显性知识学习,且促学效果相当;但三者均无法促进目标结构隐性知识学习。 The present study examines the effectiveness of three different types of written corrective feedback on the learning of explicit and implicit knowledge of English regular past tense. The study utilized a pretest-posttest-delayed posttest design with 74 Chinese learners of English who were divided into four groups: indirect feedback,direct feedback,metalinguisitc feedback,and control. A picture description task and a timed grammaticality judgement test were used to measure gains in explicit and implicit knowledge. The results revealed that the three types of written corrective feedback were equally effective in promoting explicit knowledge of the target form,but none of them had a significant effect on implicit knowledge of the target form.
机构地区 邵阳学院 剑桥大学
出处 《外语电化教学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第3期58-62,67,共6页 Technology Enhanced Foreign Language Education
基金 湖南省教育厅教改项目"基于模因论的大学英语写作教学模式的改革研究"(项目编号:[247]456)的阶段性研究成果
关键词 书面纠正性反馈 英语一般过去时 显性知识 隐性知识 二语学习 Written Corrective Feedback English Regular Past Tense Explicit Knowledge Implicit Knowledge L2 Learning
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献53

  • 1Bitchener, J. 2008. Evidence in support of written corrective feedback [J]. Journal of Second Language Writing 17.. 102-18.
  • 2Bitchener, J. : U. Knock 2008. The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students [J]. Language Teaching Research 12 : 409-31.
  • 3Bitchener, J. b- U. Knock. 2010. The contribution of written corrective feedback to language development. A ten month investigation [J]. Applied Linguistics 31: 193-214.
  • 4Bitchener, J. , S. Young b- D. Cameron. 2005. The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student wrmng [J]. Journal of Second Language Writing 14: 191-205.
  • 5Chandler, J. 2003. The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing [J]. Journal of Second Language Writing 12.. 267-96.
  • 6Ellis, R. 2004. The definition and measurement of L2 explicit knowledge [J]. Language Learning 54: 227- 75.
  • 7Ellis, R., Y. Sheen, M. Murakami : H. Takashima. 2008. The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context [J]. System 36: 353-71.
  • 8Ferris, D. R. 2002. Treatment of Error in Second Language Student Writing [M]. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • 9Ferris, D. R. 2006. Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short-and long-term effects of written error correction [A]. In K. Hyland : F. Hyland (eds.). Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues [C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 81-104.
  • 10Gufnette, D. 2007. Is feedback pedagogically correct? Research design issues in studies of feedback in writing [J]. Journal of Second Language Writing 16 : 40-53.

共引文献43

同被引文献39

引证文献5

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部