期刊文献+

道歉在信任修复中的作用:来自元分析的证据 被引量:13

The trust repair effect of apology: A systematic review and meta-analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用元分析方法对道歉的信任修复效果进行探讨。通过中英文献检索,共有18篇文献36个独立样本符合元分析标准(N=4731)。元分析的结果表明,道歉在信任修复中起到一定促进作用,呈中等效应量(d=0.44)。调节效应检验发现,信任违背类型的调节作用显著,相比于诚实型信任违背,道歉对能力型信任违背有较好的修复效果。此外,控制组设置对道歉的信任修复效果具有显著的调节作用,以沉默为控制组的信任修复效果优于以否认为控制组的信任修复效果。信任类型、道歉所包含的成分以及测量工具的调节作用均不显著。 A meta-analysis was conducted to explore the effect of apology on trust repair, as well as potential moderators of this effect. A literature research yielded 18 qualified papers with 36 effect sizes and 4731 participants. Heterogeneity test indicated that random effects model was appropriate for the recta-analysis. Results showed that apology played a positive effect on trust repair (d = 0.44, p 〈 0.001). This repair effect was moderated by type of trust violation and type of control group. Compared with the integrity-based trust violation, apology produced a better repair effect on competence-based trust violation. In addition, larger effect was found when silence control group was used than when deny control group was used. No other moderators were found.
作者 袁博 董悦 李伟强 YUAN Bo DONG Yue LI Weiqiang(Department of Psychology, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China)
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2017年第7期1103-1113,共11页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 国家自然科学基金(31600914) 教育部人文社会科学基金(15YJC190026) 浙江省哲学社科规划项目(16NDJC105YB)资助
关键词 道歉 信任修复 元分析 调节效应 apology trust repair meta-analysis moderate effect
  • 相关文献

同被引文献125

引证文献13

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部