期刊文献+

PFNA内固定治疗老年骨质疏松性股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效分析 被引量:56

Clinical analysis of PFNA internal fixation invasive in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨股骨近端防旋髓内钉(PFNA)内固定治疗老年骨质疏松性股骨粗隆间骨折的临床疗效。方法自2014年7月~2015年12月采用闭合复位PFNA内固定治疗老年骨质疏松性股骨粗隆间骨折42例。记录麻醉后牵引复位时间、手术时间、手术失血量、术后引流量,以及术中、术后并发症,末次随访采用髋关节功能Harris评分评定疗效。结果本组麻醉后牵引复位时间12~18(13.8±4.6)分钟,手术操作时间28~66(42.6±18.2)分钟,术中失血量150~550(271.6±115.5)mL,术后引流量80~240(150.8±90.7)mL,住院时间(15.5±2.5)天。所有42例患者均获得随访6~18个月,平均8.2个月,骨折愈合时间平均4.5个月。末次随访使用Harris评分标准评定疗效:优29例,良11例,可2例,优良率95.2%。结论闭合复位PFNA内固定治疗老年骨质疏松性股骨粗隆间骨折手术创伤小,操作简单,具有良好支撑,是一种效果确切的手术方法。 Objective To investigate the clinical effect of treatment of intertrochanteric fracture of femur (IFF) with proximal femoral nail (PFNA). Methods Clinical data of 42 elderly osteoporotic patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures from Jul 2014 to Dec 2015 were treated with proximal femoral nail (PFNA) in our hospital. Operative time, the blood loss, traction reset time, volume of drainage after surgery, intraoperative and postoperative complication and last Harris hip function score were recorded. Results All 42 patients were followed up with an average of 8.2 months (range, 6 to 18 months). The average time of fracture healing is 4.5 months. The excellent rate was 95.2% for last Harris hip function scores. Conclusion PFNA internal fixation for femoral intertrochanteric fracture had good clinical efficacy. It is minimally invasive, good support, simplicity of operator for elderly osteoporotic patients, and it is safe.
作者 王煜 李志君 郑玉鹏 江天蔚 Wang Yu Li Zhijun Zheng Yupeng et al.(The second people's Hospital of Dalian, Dalian Liaoning, 116011, China)
出处 《生物骨科材料与临床研究》 CAS 2017年第4期20-23,共4页 Orthopaedic Biomechanics Materials and Clinical Study
关键词 股骨粗隆间骨折 骨质疏松 股骨近端防旋髓内钉 内固定 Femoral intertrochanteric fracture Osteoporotic Proximal femoral nail-rotation Internal fixation
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献56

  • 1章暐,邹剑,罗从风,张长青.股骨近端髓内钉与动力髋螺钉治疗老年股骨转子间及转子下骨折的比较研究[J].中华骨科杂志,2004,24(11):649-652. 被引量:180
  • 2张欢,张帆,吴林珍,崔文慧.西安市中老年居民运动机能综合评价标准的应用研究[J].西安体育学院学报,2006,23(5):82-86. 被引量:2
  • 3Cauley JA, Hochberg MC, Lui LY, et al. Long-term risk of inci- dent vertebral fractures. JAMA, 2007, 298(23): 2761-2767.
  • 4Kanis JA, McCloskey EV, Johansson H, et al. Case finding for the management cff osteoporosis with FRAX--assessment and in- tervention thresholds for the UK. Osteoporos Int, 2008, 19(10): 1395-1408.
  • 5Kanis JA. Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: synopsis of a WHO report. WHO Study Group. Osteoporos Int, 1994, 4(6): 368-381.
  • 6NIH. NIH Consensus Development Panel on osteoporosis preven- tion, diagnosis, and therapy. JAMA, 2001, 285(6): 785-795.
  • 7Watts NB, Lewiecki EM, Miller PD, et al. National Osteoporosis Foundation 2008. Clinician's Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis and the World Health Organization Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX): what they mean to the bone densito- metrist and bone technologist. I Clin Densitom, 2008, 11(4): 473- 477.
  • 8Charlson M, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J, et al. Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol, 1994, 47 (11): 1245-1251.
  • 9Bischoff HA, Stiihelin HB, Monsch AU, et al. Identifying a cut- off point for normal mobility: a comparison of the timed "up and go" test in community-dwelling and institutionalised elderly women. Age Ageing, 2003, 32(3): 315-320.
  • 10中华医学会骨科学分会.骨质疏松骨折诊疗指南(2008版)[J].中华骨科杂志,2008,:1001-1003.

共引文献140

同被引文献335

引证文献56

二级引证文献232

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部