期刊文献+

中美脱口秀节目言语幽默的语用策略对比研究 被引量:5

A Comprative Study of Pragmatic Strategies of Verbal Humor in Chinese and Amerian Talk Show
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章选取中美访谈类脱口秀节目作为语料的来源,随机收集节目中主持人与名人嘉宾或观众面对面交谈所产生的幽默语句进行语用策略对比研究。立足于"脱口秀"节目这一语境,先对所收集的幽默语料进行语用策略的分类归纳,然后对其进行数据统计,以分析幽默语用策略的实施在中美脱口秀节目中的异同。最后,从跨文化交际的角度进一步揭示中美脱口秀节目中部分幽默语用策略出现实施异同的原因。 The author aims to compare pragmatic strategies performed in humorous speech acts in Chinese and American talk shows.Talk shows which refer to programs with interviews will be chosen as the source of data.From this kind of Chinese and American talk shows,humorous utterances are collected for the present study.Under the specific context of talk shows,the author will first classify pragmatic strategies.Then,a comparative study of pragmatic strategies adopted in Chinese and American talk shows will be carried out.In the end,the author attempts to probe into the reason for the different preference of pragmatic strategies from the perspective of cultural difference between China and America.
作者 陈焕红
出处 《海外英语》 2010年第4X期181-183,共3页 Overseas English
关键词 中美脱口秀节目 言语幽默 语用策略 对比 文化 chinese and amerian talk show verbal humor pragmatic strategies comparison culture
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献23

  • 1冯寿忠.“误解”初探[J].山东师范学院学报,1983,28(6):73-77. 被引量:12
  • 2徐思益.在一定语境中产生的歧义现象[J].中国语文,1985,(5).
  • 3Edmonson, W. 1981. Spoken Discourse: A Model for Analysis [M]. New York: Longrnan Group Limited.
  • 4Levinson, S. 1987. Pragmatics and the grarmnar of anaphora: A partial pragmatic reduction of binding and control phenomena [J ]. Journal of Linguistics 23: 379-431.
  • 5Sperber, D. & D. Wilson. 1986/1995. Relevance:Communication and cognition [M]. Oxford:Blackwell.
  • 6Thomas, J. 1995. Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics [M]. London: Longman.
  • 7Tzanne, A. 2000. Talking at Cross-purposes: The Dynamics of Miscommunication [M]. Amsterdam:John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  • 8Verschueren, J. 1999. Understanding Pragmatics [M]. London: Edward Arnold.
  • 9Wilson, D. & D. Sperber. 1993. Linguistic form and relevance [J]. Lingua 90:1-25.
  • 10Yus, F. 1999. Misunderstandings and explicit/implicit communication [ J ]. Pragmatics 9: 487-517.

共引文献160

同被引文献13

引证文献5

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部