期刊文献+

A Revolution or Not:A Comprehensive View On TG Grammar 被引量:1

A Revolution or Not:A Comprehensive View On TG Grammar
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Norm Chomsky's TG grammar is apparently the most influential linguistic theory in the 20th century. TG grammar is innova-tive and revolutionary in many aspects; it has overturned the dominance of behaviorism in linguistic study,and has lead people to the study of the unique features of human language. However,in the writer's point of view,its impact is still below the mark of a "revolution". This article tries to provide comprehensive and objective proofs to testify this argument. Norm Chomsky's TG grammar is apparently the most influential linguistic theory in the 20th century. TG grammar is innova-tive and revolutionary in many aspects; it has overturned the dominance of behaviorism in linguistic study,and has lead people to the study of the unique features of human language. However,in the writer's point of view,its impact is still below the mark of a 'revolution'. This article tries to provide comprehensive and objective proofs to testify this argument.
作者 尹小花
出处 《海外英语》 2010年第11X期416-417,共2页 Overseas English
关键词 CHOMSKY TG GRAMMAR ORIGINALITY WEAKNESS REVOLUTION Chomsky TG Grammar originality weakness revolution
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献36

  • 1李行德.语法的心理现实性[J].当代语言学,1992(3):25-34. 被引量:13
  • 2石毓智.乔姆斯基“普遍语法”假说的反证——来自认知心理学的启示[J].解放军外国语学院学报,2005,28(1):1-9. 被引量:40
  • 3[1]David W. Carroll, Psychology of Language (Third Edition),Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press & Brooks/Cole/Thomson Learning Asia, 2000.
  • 4[3]诺姆·乔姆斯基.句法理论的若干问题[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1986.
  • 5Chomsky, Noam. Syntactic Structures [ M ]. The Hague :Mouton, 1957.
  • 6Chomsky, Noam. The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory [ M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1975.
  • 7Chomsky, Noam. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use [ M ]. USA, Westport : Greenwood Publishing Group, 1985.
  • 8Flavell, John H. , Patricia H. Miller, and Scott A. Miller. Cognitive Development (4th ed. ) [ M]. Prentice Hall,Inc, 2001.
  • 9Nagel, Ernest. (1979). The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation [ M].徐向东(译),上海译文出版社.2002.
  • 10Chomsky Noam.Aspects of the Theory of Syntax,1965.

共引文献36

同被引文献27

  • 1李行德.语法的心理现实性[J].当代语言学,1992(3):25-34. 被引量:13
  • 2Chomsky Noam.Aspects of the Theory of Syntax,1965.
  • 3Chomsky,N.Language and Mind,1968.
  • 4Chomsky,N.Rules and Representations,1980.
  • 5Chomsky,N.Language and Problems of Knowledge: The Managua Lectures,1988.
  • 6Chomsky N.Lectures on Government and Binding,1981.
  • 7Chomsky N.The Minimalist Program,1995.
  • 8Wittgenstein L.Philosophical Investigations,1958.
  • 9徐烈炯.Chomsky的心智主义语言观,1993(01).
  • 10Chomsky N.Syntactic Structures,1957.

引证文献1

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部