期刊文献+

Towards an Understanding of Management Style Differences between China and Sweden

Towards an Understanding of Management Style Differences between China and Sweden
下载PDF
导出
摘要 With the world becomes closer,the issue of understanding management and culture difference is getting more and more important.The purpose of this research is to find how culture factors impact management style in China and Sweden.The study used Hofstede's five cultural dimensions,traditional management practice and Denison's model of organizational culture and effectiveness as framework to identify what different management styles exist between two countries,as well as explain why the difference occurs in term of national culture dimensions and traditional management practice.The interviews were made by five Chinese employees whom have work experiences in China and now are working in Swedish organization in Sweden.From their perspectives,the paper found the dimension of involvement and consistency is significant different between two countries,subsequently,those differences were analyzed by Hofstede's five culture dimensions,the study found:the small power distance,feminine value and lower uncertainty avoidance as well as lower hierarchy are the reasons of Swedish management style such as high level of agreement,good communication,and high capability development in Sweden.Meanwhile,the large power distance,masculine value,high uncertainty avoidance,guanxi and paternalism style of leadership are the mainly reasons of Chinese management style such like lower level of team orientation,ineffective and lower learning capacity in China.In addition,the long-term orientation cause Chinese organization like to have a long time planning,but the paternalism style of leadership induce the strategy of company departs from the reality. With the world becomes closer,the issue of understanding management and culture difference is getting more and more important.The purpose of this research is to find how culture factors impact management style in China and Sweden.The study used Hofstede's five cultural dimensions,traditional management practice and Denison's model of organizational culture and effectiveness as framework to identify what different management styles exist between two countries,as well as explain why the difference occurs in term of national culture dimensions and traditional management practice.The interviews were made by five Chinese employees whom have work experiences in China and now are working in Swedish organization in Sweden.From their perspectives,the paper found the dimension of involvement and consistency is significant different between two countries,subsequently,those differences were analyzed by Hofstede's five culture dimensions,the study found:the small power distance,feminine value and lower uncertainty avoidance as well as lower hierarchy are the reasons of Swedish management style such as high level of agreement,good communication,and high capability development in Sweden.Meanwhile,the large power distance,masculine value,high uncertainty avoidance,guanxi and paternalism style of leadership are the mainly reasons of Chinese management style such like lower level of team orientation,ineffective and lower learning capacity in China.In addition,the long-term orientation cause Chinese organization like to have a long time planning,but the paternalism style of leadership induce the strategy of company departs from the reality.
作者 国婉莉
出处 《海外英语》 2011年第5X期309-312,共4页 Overseas English
关键词 CULTURE management STYLE DIFFERENCE culture management style difference
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Tor Grenness.Scandinavian Managers on Scandinavian Management[J]. International Journal of Value - Based Management . 2003 (1)
  • 2Daun A.The Japanese of the North-the Swedes of Asia. Ethnologica Scandinavia . 1986
  • 3Hofstede Geert.Cultures and organizations software of the mind. . 2001
  • 4Lindkvist L.Management in the Nordic countries-differences and similarities. . 1991
  • 5Martinsons M G,Hempel P S.Chinese management systems:historical and cross-cultural perspectives. Journal of Systems Management . 1995
  • 6Ostroff C,Schmitt N.Configurations of organizational effectiveness and efficiency. The Academy of Management Journal . 1993
  • 7Robert Angel.Organizational Culture-Preparing for Future Strategic Practices. Futurerakes . 2008
  • 8Tixier Maud.management and communication style in Europe:can they be compared and matched?. Employee Relations . 1994
  • 9Saffold GS.Culture traits, strength, and organizational performance: moving beyond "strong" culture. The Academy of Management Journal . 1988
  • 10Bond,Michael Harries.The Psychology of the Chinese People. . 1986

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部