期刊文献+

国家试点学院教师考核评价机制研究——基于本科教育质量导向的实践探索 被引量:2

On the Evaluation Mechanism of Teachers in National Pilot Schools
原文传递
导出
摘要 没有一流的本科教育就没有一流的高等教育,建设一流的本科教育,必须有一流的本科教学为基础。提高本科教育质量,创建世界一流大学需要一流的师资力量,改革教师考核分配和聘任制度,建立科学的教师考核评价机制,对于建设一支高水平教师队伍具有重要作用。"国家教育体制改革试点学院"华中科技大学光学与电子信息学院的考察显示,该院教师考核评价的类别、指标构成、考核体系特征及取得的成效,对我国研究型大学建立健全科学的教师考核评价制度,提升本科教育质量具有借鉴意义。 First-class undergraduate teaching is the foundation for first-class undergraduate education and there would be no first-class higher education without first-class undergraduate education.The firstclass teaching staff is the prerequisite for the quality of undergraduate teaching and the construction of first-class universities.To innovate the appraisal,distribution and recruitment system and build a scientific evaluation system for teachers are of great significance for the construction of a high-level teaching staff.A survey from the School of Optical and Electronic Information at Huazhong University of Science and Technology,apilot school for national education system reform indicates that the categories,index constitutes and characteristics of teachers'evaluation system conducted in this school,and the achievements this system has made provide certain reference meanings for the construction of a sound and scientific evaluation system of teachers in research-oriented universities in China in order to promote the undergraduate education.
出处 《高等工程教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第4期104-109,共6页 Research in Higher Education of Engineering
基金 教育部试点学院专项经费资助
关键词 试点学院 评价机制 本科质量 pilot school evaluation system quality of undergraduate
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献34

  • 1唐纳德·肯尼迪.学术责任[M].北京:新华出版社,2002.24、23.
  • 2HARMAN G. Quality Assurance for Higher Education: Developing and Managing Quality Assurance in Higher Education Systems and Institutions in Asia and the Pacific[M]. Bangkok : UNESCO, 1996 : 6.
  • 3LIM D. Quality Assurance in Higher Education: A Study of Developing Countries[M]. Burlington: Ashgate Publishing Company, 2001 : 13.
  • 4ELKEN M. QU Trends 1995-2006 Literature overview[M]. Oslo: University of Oslo, 2009 : 44.
  • 5HAMBLIN D. A Model for Managing Data Assurance in Higher Education[J]. Phoenix Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management,2012, (8): 421-435.
  • 6EWELL T. Institutional Characteristics and Faculty, Administrator Perceptions of Outcomes: An Exploratory Analysis [J]. Research in Higher Education, 1989, (2) : 13-36.
  • 7WITTEK L. On the Problems of Asking for a Definition of Quality in Education Scandinavian[J]. Journal of Educational Research, 2011, (12) : 671-684.
  • 8HARVEY L, GREEN D. Defining Quality Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education[J]. 1993, (1) :9-34.
  • 9KUH G D. The National Survey of Student Engagement: Conceptual Framework and Overview of Psychometric Properties [ EB/OL]. [ 2014-02-21]. http ://nsse. iub. edu/pdf/conceptual_framework_2003. pdf.
  • 10KELLER T,FARRAN S. University Students Grade Their Schools[J]. Australian Journal of Adult Learning,2009, (2) :76-88.

共引文献24

同被引文献21

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部