期刊文献+

OECD“催化剂项目”中的STEM教学模式及其启示 被引量:10

The STEM Instruction Models and Its Enlightenment of OECD Catalyst Initiative Program
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着科技创新能力日益成为国际竞争的核心要素,以培养创新人才为主要目标的STEM教育正逐渐被世界各国视为一种国家发展战略。该文首先描述了OECD"催化剂项目"的基本情况,然后分析了该项目中STEM教学模式所依据的主要理论——"做中学""情境学习理论"与形成性评价,并进一步归纳了"催化剂项目"所倡导的教育游戏、线上实验室、通过技术的合作、实时形成性评价和基于技能的课程模块等五种STEM教学模式的基本形式和经典案例。基于此,提出我国在STEM教育教学模式上应加大资金投入,完善STEM教育的技术支持和设施建设;整合教育课程,构建以技能为导向的STEM课程体系;加快STEM师资培养,提高STEM教师的教学能力;构建实时的、多元化的形成性教育评价体系,提升STEM教学效果;强化顶层设计,合作开发与共享STEM教育资源。 As the technological innovation ability has become a core element in the international competition, STEM education with the goal of innovate talents training is gradually being regarded as a national development strategy by the world. Firstly, the article describes the basic situations of the catalyst project of OECD STEM instruction models based on theories of "learning by doing" "situated learning" and "formative assessment". The paper further summarized five models and the classic examples of STEM which advocated by the program that is educational gaming, online laboratories, collaboration through technology, real-time formative assessment, skills-based curriculum alignment. According to the experience about STEM instruction models of OECD Catalyst Initiative Program, the paper suggested that the STEM education in China should increase investment, improve the construction of technical support and facilities of STEM education; integration of education curriculum and construct a STEM skill oriented curriculum system; carry out the professional training for STEM teachers to improve the teachers' STEM teaching ability; construct of the formative evaluation system of real-time and diversity to enhance the results of STEM Teaching; strengthen top-level design and cooperation in the teaching mode and education resource sharing.
出处 《中国电化教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第8期53-59,共7页 China Educational Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金委员会2016年度应急管理项目"STEM教育的国际比较研究"(项目编号:71641010)的阶段性成果
关键词 STEM教育 教学模式 教学启示 STEM Education Instruction Model Teaching Enlightenment
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献62

  • 1张建伟,陈琦.科学发现学习的新近研究[J].心理学动态,2001,9(4):289-294. 被引量:16
  • 2张建伟,孙燕青.从“做中学”到建构主义——探究学习的理论轨迹[J].教育理论与实践,2006,26(4):35-39. 被引量:70
  • 3教育部.教育部关于大力推进教师教育课程改革的意见[Z].教师[2011]6号,2011.
  • 4Genesee F & Upshur J A. Classroom-based evaluation in second language education[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1996.
  • 5Hamp-Lyons L & Condon W. Assessing the portfolio: Principles for practice, theory & research[M].Mount Waverly: Hampton Press, Inc , 2000.
  • 6Hein G & Price S. Active assessment for active science[M]. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann, 1994.
  • 7National Council oF Teachers oF Mathematics. Assessment standards For school mathematics [M]. Reston,VA: NCTM, 1995.
  • 8National Research Council. Classroom assessment and the National Science Education Standards [M].Committee on Classroom Assessment and the National Science Education Standards. J M Atkin, P Black, J Coffey (eds.). Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education.Washington, DC: National Academy press, 2001.
  • 9Rassi j A. Rational for formative assessment component in new audiology certification standards. 1999.Retrieved March 30, 2003, from http://professional, asha. org/academic/Rassi Formative Assess. cfm.
  • 10Sadler, D. R. Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems[J]. Instructional Science, 1989,18(2): 119--144.

共引文献657

同被引文献106

引证文献10

二级引证文献126

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部