期刊文献+

e-Learning视域中知识可视化模型比较研究 被引量:1

A Comparison Study on Knowledge Visualization Model in the Field of e-Learning
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着知识可视化工具应用日渐普及,学术界对于知识可视化的研究逐步深入,相关研究者提出了较为系统化的知识可视化模型。该研究基于e-Learning视域,对现有的典型知识可视化模型进行比较分析,旨在挖掘分析知识可视化的过程和方法。通过分析发现已有知识可视化模型在其构成要素和核心过程上基本一致,但在理论基础、差异性要素以及交互定位等三个方面存在一定差异。对知识可视化的交互进行深入研究,以及根据知识类型的差异采用针对性的知识可视化方法,这两点将成为后续相关研究的关注重点。本研究对于完善知识可视化基础理论,指导知识可视化实践有着重要意义。 With the widespread application of knowledge visualization tools, the research of knowledge visualization is becoming more and more deeply, and the related researchers put forward a more systematic knowledge visualization structure model. In this study, the existing typical knowledge visualization models will be compared and studied more deeply based on E-learning. The purpose of this study is to understand the process and method of visualization. It is found that the various knowledge visualization models are almost identical in their constituent elements and core processes, but there are differences in the three aspects of theoretical basis, the differences between the elements and interaction orientation. We study the interaction behavior of knowledge visualization, and adopt different knowledge visualization methods for different types of knowledge, which will become the focus of building knowledge visualization model. This study is of great significance for improving the basic theory of knowledge visualization and guiding the practice of knowledge visualization.
作者 王楠 刘燕
出处 《中国电化教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第8期123-127,共5页 China Educational Technology
基金 全国教育科学规划课题"泛在学习环境中数字资源聚合模式及推荐机制研究"(项目编号:DCA140238)资助
关键词 E-LEARNING 知识可视化 知识可视化模型 比较研究 e-Learning Knowledge Visualization Knowledge Visualization Model Comparison Study
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献54

  • 1赵国庆.知识可视化2004定义的分析与修订[J].电化教育研究,2009,30(3):15-18. 被引量:127
  • 2赵国庆,黄荣怀,陆志坚.知识可视化的理论与方法[J].开放教育研究,2005,11(1):23-27. 被引量:354
  • 3周立元.基于资源的开放式网络课程建设模式研究[J].中国远程教育,2006(04S):48-51. 被引量:28
  • 4程静,杨明,邱玉辉.基于知识点对象的个性化学习系统实施[J].西南师范大学学报(自然科学版),2006,31(5):120-123. 被引量:12
  • 5李徐平,和金生.新划分标准下的知识进化与知识传播模型[J].中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),2007,7(1):42-46. 被引量:4
  • 6Biggs,J.B,& Collis,K.F..Evaluating the Quality of Learning:the SOLO Taxonomy.New York:Academic Press.1982.
  • 7Biggs,J.B,& Collis,K.F,.Multimodal learning and the quality of intelligent behaviour.In H.Rowe(Ed.),Intelligence,Reconceptualization and Measurement.New Jersey:Laurence Erlbaurn Assoc.1991,pp.57-76.
  • 8Pegg,J..Assessing students' understanding at the primary and secondary level in the mathematical sciences.In J.Izard & M.Stephens(Eds),Reshaping Assessment Practice:Assessment in the Mathematical Sciences Under Challenge.Melbourne:Australian Council of Educational Research.1992,pp.368-385.
  • 9Pegg,J.& Davey,G..Interpreting Student Understanding in Geometry:A synthesis of Two Models.In R.Lehrer & C.Chazan,(Eds),Designing Learning Environments for Developing Understanding of Geometry and Space.New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum.1998,pp.109-135.
  • 10Case,R..The Mind' s Staircase:Exploring the conceptual underpinnings of children' s thought and knowledge.New Jersey:Laurence Erlbaum Assoc.1992.

同被引文献24

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部