期刊文献+

国际环境政治与全球公民教育的批判路径 被引量:2

International Environmental Politics and Critical Approach to Global Citizenship Education
原文传递
导出
摘要 自20世纪90年代以来,全球公民教育研究和实践蓬勃发展,然而全球公民教育实践的效果很有限。对于全球公民教育的探讨不能回避"全球公民教育如何可能"这一前提性问题。"全球公民"身份推衍困境、"在地实施"的"异化"后果让全球公民教育实施的可能性成为问题。环境问题既是一个"全球共同利益"问题,也是各国政府关心的问题,为解答"全球公民教育何以可能"提供了较好的切入点。国际环境政治解释了全球环境治理中发展中国家与发达国家的不合作与不平等状况。以全球环境问题及其治理作为教育内容,全球公民教育具有批判性。批判的生态教育学成为全球公民教育的重要实践形态。在既有的国家边界限制下,批判的生态教育学通过全球与在地的混合行动,让全球公民教育获得了一种新的可能性。 The research and practice of global citizenship education have thrived since 1990s, but the effectiveness of global citizenship education is limited. The researcher cannot avoid the problematic premise of the possibility of global citizenship education. The identity predicament of global citizen and alienation of local implementing make probability of the global citizenship education problematic. The practical predicament of the global citizenship education manifests that the Environmental question, which is about global common nation state is the key factor of policy implementation. good, attracts the attention from the government of most of nations, and becomes the good case for exploring the feasibility of global citizenship education. Environmental politics explain the inequality and injustice in the globally environmental governance which made the global citizenship education critical. The critical ecopedagogy becomes the new form of global citizenship. The practice of the global citizenship education becomes viable by hybrid activism generated by dialectical movement between local and global in the limit of nation-state.
作者 郑富兴
出处 《比较教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第8期64-71,共8页 International and Comparative Education
基金 国家社会科学基金教育学一般课题"美丽中国视野下的公民美育研究"(课题号:BEA140075)阶段性研究成果
关键词 全球公民教育 生态教育学 环境政治 Global Citizenship Education Ecopedagogy Environmental Politics
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献37

  • 1姜英敏.东亚国际理解教育的价值冲突探析[J].比较教育研究,2007,28(5):53-58. 被引量:22
  • 2[英]德里克·希特.何谓公民身份[J].郭忠华译.长春:吉林出版集团有限责任公司,2007.141,139,140.
  • 3N. Myers and J. Kent, The New Consumers. The Influence of Affluence on the Environment,Washington. Island Press, 2004.
  • 4W. Sachs and T. Santarius, Fair Future.Resource Conflicts, Security and Global Justice,London. Zed Books, 2007.
  • 5D. Boyer and Y. Saillard, Regulation Theory.The State of the Art, London. Routledge, 2002.
  • 6Thomas Barfuss, Conformity and Bizarre Consciousness. On the Generalization of Modes of Liv- ing and the Culture of the Twentieth Century, Hamburg. Argument-Verlag, 2002, p. 30.
  • 7S. Mavroudeas, "Commodities, workers, and institutions. A analytical and empirical problems in regulation's consumption theory, "Review of Radical Political Economics, vol.35, no.4,2003, p. 492.
  • 8T. Forsyth, Critical Political Ecology ,London. Routledge,2003.
  • 9D. L. Levy and P. J. Newell, The Business of Global Envi- ronmental Governance ,Cambridge, MA. MIT Press, 2005.
  • 10G. Mann,"Should political ecology be Marxist? A case for Gram- sci' s historical materialism, "Geoforum, vol.40, no.3,2003,pp. 335 - 344.

同被引文献23

引证文献2

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部