期刊文献+

起搏器围手术期不同抗凝方案安全性评价

Safety of different anticoagulant methods in perioperative period of pacemaker implantation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较起搏器围手术期不同抗凝方案的安全性。方法回顾性分析医院收治的长期服用抗凝药物并需要安装永久起搏器的86例患者的临床资料,根据抗凝方案的不同将其分为A、B、C 3组。A组28例,围手术期不中断使用华法林治疗;B组29例,起搏器术前3~5 d停用华法林,之后不进行抗凝,术后12 h恢复使用华法林;C组29例,起搏器术前3~5 d停用华法林,以低分子肝素钠桥接治疗,术后12 h恢复使用华法林。比较3组住院时间、囊袋相关并发症及血栓栓塞事件发生情况。结果 A组住院时间最短,C组最长,3组间比较有显著差异(P<0.05)。总囊袋相关并发症发生率A组为3.57%、B组为6.90%、C组为17.24%,A组的发生率最低,而C组最高,但3组间囊袋相关并发症发生率和血栓栓塞事件发生率差异均不显著(P>0.05)。结论起搏器围手术期不中断使用华法林为理想的抗凝方案,总囊袋相关并发症发生率相对较低。 Objective To compare the safety of different anticoagulant methods in the perioperative period of pacemaker implantation.Methods The clinical data of a total of 86 patients who had been admitted to our hospital and had taken anticoagulants for a long time to install a permanent pacemaker were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were divided into groups A, B and C according to different anticoagulant methods. Warfarin therapy was adopted in Group A (n =28) in the perioperative period without interruption; warfarin therapy in group B(n=29) was stopped 3-5 days before pacemaker implantation, after which no anticoagulation was conducted, and resumed 12 hours after the operation; warfarin therapy in group C (n=29) was stopped 3-5 days before pacemaker implantation, after which bridging therapy with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) was conducted, and resumed 12 hours after the operation. The length of stay (LOS), and incidence of complications associated with sac and thromboembolic events among the three groups were compared. Results The LOS was the shortest in group A and the longest in group C, showing significant difference among the three groups (P 〈 0.05). The total incidence of complications associated with sac was 3.57% in group A, 6.90% in group B and 17.24% in group C. The incidence in group A was the lowest and that in group C was the highest, but the difference in the complications associated with sac and thromboembolic events among the three groups showed no significant difference (P 〉 0.05). Conclusion The uninterrupted use of warfarin in perioperative period of pacemaker implantation is an ideal anticoagulation method. The total incidence of complications associated with sac in relatively low.
作者 安宁 曹瑞
出处 《西南国防医药》 CAS 2017年第8期802-805,共4页 Medical Journal of National Defending Forces in Southwest China
关键词 心脏起搏器 华法林 围手术期 并发症 cardiac pacemaker warfarin perioperative period complication
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献95

  • 1刘力斗,刘晓云,苏建玲,田英平,石汉文,佟飞,郭宪立,霍书花,高恒波.急性心肌梗死合并上消化道出血36例治疗体会[J].临床荟萃,2009,24(17):1510-1511. 被引量:4
  • 2冯义柏.心脏起搏器植入技术指南[J].中华心律失常学杂志,1998,2(3):217-224. 被引量:31
  • 3姚志发,张国伟,王淑霞,张邻杰,李刚,张庆华,吕航,李君权.体外循环心内直视手术后缺血性胃肠道损害[J].中华胸心血管外科杂志,2006,22(3):204-205. 被引量:3
  • 4江力勤,钱钢,刘加芳,徐金英,汪世军.起搏器囊袋血肿的防治[J].心脑血管病防治,2006,6(5):329-330. 被引量:14
  • 5马长生 盖鲁粤 张奎俊 等.介人心脏病学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1998.64.
  • 6吕斐,张澍.心脏起搏与除颤[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2010.
  • 7Furie B, Fufie BC. Mechanisms of thrombus formation [ J ]. N Engl J Med, 2008, 359 (9) : 938 -949.
  • 8Maree AO, Fitzgerald DJ. Disease variable platelet response to aspirin and clopidogrel in atherothmmbotic disease [ J ]. Circulation, 2007, 115 (16): 2196-2207.
  • 9Vane JR, Botting RM. The mechanism of action of aspirin [J]. Thromb Res, 2003, 110 (5 -6) : 255 -258.
  • 10Hirsh J, Warkentin TE, Shaughnessy SG, et al. Heparin and low - molecular - weight heparin: mechanisms of action, pharmacoki- netics, dosing, monitoring, efficacy and safety [J]. Chest, 2001, 119 (1 Suppl): 64S -94S.

共引文献223

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部