期刊文献+

NLR、PLR及其变化趋势对直肠癌术后吻合口漏预测价值 被引量:7

Value of NLR,PLR and their changes in predicting occurrence of anastomotic leakage after surgery in patients with rectal cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探索中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio,NLR)、血小板与淋巴细胞比值(Plateletlymphocyte ratio,PLR)及其术后变化对直肠癌患者术后吻合口漏(Anastomotic leakage,AL)的预测价值。方法:纳入187例2015年3月至2016年3月西南医科大学附属医院胃肠外科直肠癌患者。选取术前中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(术前NLR)、血小板淋巴细胞比值(术前PLR)、手术前后中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值的变化值(术后NLR/术前NLR)及手术前后血小板、淋巴细胞比值的变化值(术后PLR/术前PLR)作为观察指标,同时观察危险因素,包括年龄、性别、肿瘤病理分期、淋巴分期、分化程度、肿瘤下极距肛门的距离。单因素分析采用χ~2检验或Fisher确切概率法,多因素分析采用Logistic回归方程。结果:单因素分析显示术前NLR(Fisher值=7.242)、术前PLR(χ~2=6.787)、手术前后NLR(χ~2=15.656)、PLR(χ~2=9.298)变化趋势、年龄(χ~2=4.813)和肿瘤下极距肛缘的距离(χ~2=5.951)与AL发生相关(P<0.05)。而性别(χ~2=0.001)、肿瘤病理分期(Fisher值=2.107)、淋巴分期(Fisher值=1.298)、分化程度(Fisher值=2.206)均不是影响术后AL发生的危险因素(P>0.05)。多因素分析显示术前NLR值(OR=1.647,P=0.000)、手术前后NLR变化值(OR=1.880,P=0.000)和肿瘤下极距肛缘的距离(OR=4.364,P=0.048)与AL发生相关。结论:术前NLR、手术前后NLR的变化值以及肿瘤下极距肛缘的距离是直肠癌患者术后AL的独立危险因素。 Objective: To explore the value of preoperative neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio ( NLR) , preoperative platelet- lymphocyte ratio (PLR),changes between pre and postoperative neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio(postopemtive NLR/preopemtive NLR) and changes between pre and postoperative platelet-lymphocyte ratio ( postoperative PLR/preoperative PLR) in predicting the occurrence of anastomotic leakage after surgery in patients of rectal cancer. Methods: 187 rectal cancer patients in the Gastrointestinal Surger^^ Department in the First Affiliated Hospital of Southwestern Medical University during March,2015-March,2016 were included in our study. Preoperative NLR,preoperative PLR,changes between pre and postoperative NLR and changes between pre andpostoperative PLR were obser^^ ed. At the same time we included age, gender,pathological staging, stage of lymph node metastasis,tumor differentiation,distance between tumor and anus in our study.;字2 test or Fisher's exact value was used in the univariate analysis,while Logistic Regression Analysis was used in the multivariate analysis. Results : The univariate analysis showed that preoperative NLR (Fisher's exact value = 7. 242 ),preoperative PLR (字2 = 6. 787) , changes between pre and postoperative NLR ( x~ = 15. 656 ) , PLR ( 字2 = 9. 298),age (字2 =4. 813) and distance between tumor and anus ( x~ = 5. 951) were related to anastomotic leakage( P〈0.05). Other risk factors such as, gender(;字2 = 0. 001),pathological staging ( Fisher's exact value = 2. 107 ) , stage of lymph node metastasis (Fisher's exact value = 1. 298), tumor differentiation ( Fisher's exact value = 2. 206) ,and were not associated with anastomotic leakage (P〉0. 05). Multivariate analysis showed that the preoperative NLR(0R= 1. 647, P = 0.000) , change between pre and postoperative NLR ( 0R= 1. 880, P = 0. 000) and distance between tumor and anus ( OR = 4. 364, P = 0. 048 ) were associated with anastomotic- leakage. Conclusion: preoperative NLR,change between pre and postoperative NLR and distance between tumor and anus are independent risk factors for anastomotic leakage after rectal anterior resection.
出处 《中国免疫学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2017年第8期1223-1227,共5页 Chinese Journal of Immunology
关键词 中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值 血小板与淋巴细胞比值 直肠癌 吻合口漏 预测 Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio Platelet-lymphocyte ratio Rectal cancer Anastomotic leakage Predicting
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献111

  • 1李珺,王泳,张雪松,路明.肺癌患者纤维蛋白原及D-二聚体与肿瘤分期、转移的关系[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2011,5(21):6457-6459. 被引量:23
  • 2赵广法,师英强,莫善兢.直肠全系膜切除术后吻合口漏的危险因素分析和对策[J].肿瘤,2004,24(6):595-597. 被引量:77
  • 3Peeters KC, Tollenaar RA, Marijnen CA, Klein Kranenbarg E, Steup WH, Wiggers T, Rutten HJ,van de Velde CJ. Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2005; 92:211-216
  • 4Alves A, Panis Y, Trancart D, Regimbeau JM, Pocard M, Valleur P. Factors associated with clinically significant anastomotic leakage after large bowel resection: multivariate analysis of 707 patients. World J Surg 2002; 26:499-502
  • 5Rullier E, Laurent C, Garrelon JL, Michel P, Saric J, Parneix M. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1998; 85: 355-358
  • 6Moran BJ, Heald RJ. Risk factors for, and management of anastomotic leakage in rectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 2001; 3:135-137
  • 7Vignali A, Gianotti L, Braga M, Radaelli G, Malvezzi L, Di Carlo V. Altered microperfusion at the rectal stump is predictive for rectal anastomotic leak. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43:76-82
  • 8Law WI, Chu KW, Ho JW, Chan CW. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision. Am J Surg 2000; 179:92-96
  • 9Konishi T, Watanabe T, Kishimoto J, Nagawa H. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after surgery for colorectal cancer: results of prospective surveillance. J Am Coil Surg 2006; 202:439-444
  • 10Koperna T. Cost-effectiveness of defunctioning stomas in low anterior resections for rectal cancer: a call for benchmarking, Arch Surg 2003; 138: 1334-1338; discussion 1339

共引文献91

同被引文献53

引证文献7

二级引证文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部